i do not reject the idea. I find your schizo posting inciteful

Exactly

I might not be your friend - but you sure as hell are mine, and there is nothing you can do about it

You might even hate me lol, but that's never can change the fact that I choose to get as much value from our interactions as possible

@Tekka No. Im not saying we should aid the collapse. There will be none. Acceleration is natural and there is no way to stop it. Im saying embrace it and dont waste your time trying to reform as that is even less effective

@Ater Votum sounds like a parasitical relationship but i dont lose anything

Fuck you cunt bot censoring me

Im gonna rape this fucking bot

the thing about rape: by definition you can't consent to it... But you can rape others.

if youre enough of a chad you can rape your rapist

tho i doubt at that point he would mind

unless you use rape to define other violent actions

in which case thats more of a fight

No i mean literal rape

As in I violently stick my penis inside it

Emphasis on violently

do it

you wont

*it*

Implying women are objects?

@Ater Votum nice pfp

why btw

@Notso implying?

Not talking about women

Talking about the discors bot

why would i imply something that is common knowledge

@Eoppa sex should harm neither parties. lets go back to my older definition I gave for the function of sex that isn't reproductive, I stood by this:
"The sexual union must be a unifying act, where one partner is ideally complementary to another, such that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. To this end I say that the personality of anything can be object of sexual attention, provided it psychologically completes you in some way. Now if you genuinely need an animal to be your complementary, I will say that you are not normal and that you should not normalize your feelings in society. But that does not make it immoral. "
Perhaps we could say that the sexual relationship is actually damaging to the human, because they have tricked and conditioned themselves into a relationship that cannot give them what they desire, thus harming them in their pursuit of a false good. In this sense maybe we can say bestiality is wrong not because the animal is necessarily violated in any way, but rather the human is the one primarily harmed. It is immoral because it is not in your self-interest, as I think immorality must inherently be.
This of course rests on the proposition that the animal can never be psychologically complimentary to a human, that they lack something necessarily aligned with human nature to fulfill our needs. What this could be exactly, I'm not entirely sure, but at least we have a starting point

Why are you asking me to justify myself in your morality

Is this server garbage

@Noveltist yes. Join mine

This server really degenerated from its peak

We live in a Society

LOL the scariest thing about Corona Virus is that its the next 9/11... Can't wait for the government to set the precedent for shooting me in the back of the head with peacekeeping national guard when I try to leave quarantine for food... yessir mister guberment this virus is bad!!! take away my rights and privacy please!!!!! ROFL okay Americans, no one is even asking where the Jews are right now - oh I know, laughing their asses off! please tell me if there are any confirmed cases of Corona Virus in israel and then we can talk

Holy shit this guy is cringe

^

He’s also not *technically* breaking any rules

Spam maybe

Posting wall after walls of text

If I see off topic spam I’ll deal with it

@OrthoGoat You still owe me a working definition of liberalism, bruh. Last time, you pointed out such tenets as "individuals exist", and "individualism should be enforced", and I have pointed out why these are meaningless.