Message from @GeorgyBoyo

Discord ID: 651890556099756075


2019-12-04 20:49:19 UTC  

but thats not very practical

2019-12-04 20:49:34 UTC  

i support them mostly cause of foreign policy

2019-12-04 20:50:10 UTC  

You support the Iranian regime?

2019-12-04 20:50:19 UTC  

yea because of their foreign policy

2019-12-04 20:50:32 UTC  

the shah was retarded

2019-12-04 20:50:59 UTC  

Excuse me?

2019-12-04 20:51:15 UTC  

Their foreign policy of terrorism?

2019-12-04 20:51:26 UTC  

How was Shah retarded?

2019-12-04 20:51:37 UTC  

their foreign policy of being a counterweight to the US

2019-12-04 20:51:46 UTC  

the shah was retarded because he was a puppet

2019-12-04 20:52:02 UTC  

installed by a US-backed coup

2019-12-04 20:52:27 UTC  

And the Islamists are better than that?

2019-12-04 20:52:31 UTC  

yeah

2019-12-04 20:52:53 UTC  

The people were far far better off during Shah

2019-12-04 20:52:58 UTC  

how

2019-12-04 20:56:49 UTC  

They study abroad and come back to Iran to work because they'd be making more money.
The people were a lot wealthier. They were actually advancing forward thanks to the liberals at the time.

Iran was highly respected, the relationship with the West, the arabs and the jews was at a very point.

Women actually had rights and werent treated as lesser citizens.

2019-12-04 20:57:01 UTC  

Islam hadn't fully taken over

2019-12-04 20:57:21 UTC  

yeah they had a relationship with the west because they were a literal US puppet lmfao

2019-12-04 20:57:27 UTC  

the shah was installed by the west

2019-12-04 20:59:02 UTC  

Now I'm not saying the US and especially the British did nothing wrong. Same with the Shah himself but saying Iran is better off now than during the King is just insanely stupid.

2019-12-04 21:00:20 UTC  

Puppet is a strong word, he was backed by the west but he was not their puppet. Overtime if the Islamic revolution didnt happen the liberals would slowly gain power and Shah would lose his.

2019-12-04 21:01:04 UTC  

Liberalism was to be the outcome. Except the Islamist nutjobs took over and Iran is the joke that it is now.

2019-12-04 21:01:23 UTC  

thats not a very good outcome lmfao

2019-12-04 21:01:46 UTC  

and if the shah was never overthrown iran wouldnt have the same foreign policy that they do now

2019-12-04 21:02:00 UTC  

remember that they were a US puppet, they wouldn't be the way they are right now

2019-12-04 21:02:14 UTC  

the US and its allies would essentially control the middle east

2019-12-04 21:02:33 UTC  

Liberalism is not a good outcome? A real parliament with elected officials is worse than an Islamic totalitarian regime? Okay retard.

2019-12-04 21:03:05 UTC  

I would want western influence throughout the entire world.

2019-12-04 21:03:18 UTC  

Countries with western values.

2019-12-04 21:03:26 UTC  

like israel?

2019-12-04 21:03:50 UTC  

Israel is illegitimate ethnat

2019-12-04 21:04:07 UTC  

How exactly is Iran like Israel?

2019-12-04 21:04:23 UTC  

no i said "like israel" in response to "western values"

2019-12-04 21:04:27 UTC  

iran isnt like israel, thats the thing lmfao

2019-12-04 21:05:19 UTC  

When did I say Iran is like Israel <:thronk:441701565607444482>

2019-12-04 21:05:27 UTC  

i didnt say you did

2019-12-04 21:05:45 UTC  

you said "Countries with western values."

i then asked "like israel?"

2019-12-04 21:05:57 UTC  

or are you saying iran has western values

2019-12-04 21:09:02 UTC  

TLDR: The people under shah, were educated, highly wealthy, had A LOT more freedoms. Iran overtime would turn into a legitimate Israel, an actual trustworthy ally of US and the west in general.

The current islamist regime is tyrannical and enslaves the population. They slaughter protestors. Most people right now can't afford to buy meat.

Under no circumstances you can say Islamist Iran is better than Iran during Shah.

2019-12-04 21:09:17 UTC  

Yes Iran has western values

2019-12-04 21:09:34 UTC  

no it doesnt lol