The armour on the Challenger 2 is way better than the abrams

It's not way better.

but it's heavier in comparison

Ill send it to @Deleted User for verification, no posting it punk

It's better.

But for ERA, they have the same AP protection.

Well as it comes stock, it doesn't have era

They put bricks on it.

but it's supplied with ERA in battle situations

@General 4 nigga you don't look like him you just look like another nigga

Which ontop of all the other armour

would make it probs 1.5x the armour of a abrams

Well, it i 64 tons

@ky i do

No it's not.

Don't be silly.

Lol

@General 4 Just another nigger

BRL-2 is better than chobams, it's a lighter tank, but not by much.

We have ERA, Dorchester armour, Depleted Uranium on the skirts, Reactive Armour

we have a lot of armour

Not 1.5x you mongo.

Skirts means fuck all

Tank talk?

And you should know that

Smh tank talk

It does when you get fucking pinged on the side

M1A2 is 71 to 73 tons depending on model

Better call soup

Maybe in fucking turbanstan.

In actual engagements.

Means fuck all

I had sex with a stripper and now she wont leave me the fuck alone

The XM-8>M416&M16

Why no other countries tank prioritises it. Abrams side skirts are like 100mm if that.

The XM-8>M416&M16, change my mind

No one cares

Peggy

Sounds old

That gun looks like something from starship troopers