Message from @LadyAquanine

Discord ID: 502410683237924865


2018-10-18 09:16:33 UTC  

it goes against human nature to work towards the common good

2018-10-18 09:16:48 UTC  

every socialist society always eventually turned into a brutal dictatorship

2018-10-18 09:16:53 UTC  

I have yet to see one succeed

2018-10-18 09:17:27 UTC  

socialism depends on the industrial base built by capitalism to succeed, most socialist states you are talking about originated from relatively agrarian societies, that's why it has failed. @LadyAquanine

2018-10-18 09:17:28 UTC  

people like to tout Scandinavia as a socialist paradise, but in fact, they mostly gave it up decades ago

2018-10-18 09:17:50 UTC  

trying it in industrialized nations hasn't been any more successful in Europe

2018-10-18 09:18:10 UTC  

none, because capitalism will eventually transition to socialism

2018-10-18 09:18:40 UTC  

this is seen by historical contexts

2018-10-18 09:18:41 UTC  

many of the countries that practices Democratic Socialism (a contradiction in terms, really) ends up with shitty healthcare, they are in debt with everyone, and many people move out as a result

2018-10-18 09:18:51 UTC  

America is never gonna become socialist

2018-10-18 09:18:53 UTC  

nobody will let it

2018-10-18 09:18:59 UTC  

case closed

2018-10-18 09:19:18 UTC  

@LadyAquanine the nordic countries are social democratic, not democratic socialist

2018-10-18 09:19:25 UTC  

debt dosent exist under socialism either

2018-10-18 09:19:26 UTC  

is there a difference?

2018-10-18 09:19:31 UTC  

obviously

2018-10-18 09:19:33 UTC  

neither does prosperity

2018-10-18 09:19:51 UTC  

social democracy is just a tool to lull the working class to sleep, it does not solve the problem with capitalism

2018-10-18 09:19:56 UTC  

if you look at the wealth of those nations, they're poorer than some of our worst welfare states

2018-10-18 09:20:33 UTC  

I have always found it fascinating that the biggest supporters for socialism, don't actually live in socialist countries

2018-10-18 09:20:41 UTC  

in fact, they live in America and enjoy all our freedoms and stuff

2018-10-18 09:20:43 UTC  

comparing wealth in capitalist economies to socialist economies is nitpicking. These nations weren't even industralized.

2018-10-18 09:20:54 UTC  

and you wonder why?

2018-10-18 09:20:57 UTC  

no money

2018-10-18 09:20:59 UTC  

yes because as I said socialism depends on the transition

2018-10-18 09:21:25 UTC  

@LadyAquanine so the Soviet Union, agrarian at its start due to the tsars not developing the country?

2018-10-18 09:21:36 UTC  

money dosent exist under a socialist system

2018-10-18 09:22:03 UTC  

in all terms, the form of currency is labour vouchers, not money

2018-10-18 09:22:05 UTC  

that was only due to the leaders pushing to try and compete with other nations, but if you look into their industries, they did not consider safety, and used sub-standard materials and building techniques

2018-10-18 09:22:28 UTC  

hence why Soviet-era military equipment is a laughingstock to this day

2018-10-18 09:22:52 UTC  

@LadyAquanine yes, due to stalinist policies and their determination not to get left behind by the west, I don't support stalinism or Marxism-leninism

2018-10-18 09:22:59 UTC  

good

2018-10-18 09:23:16 UTC  

@LadyAquanine the USA was industrialized at the beginning of the Great War, the Russian empire was agrarian

2018-10-18 09:23:35 UTC  

comparing developing economies to developed economies isn't really an arguement tbh

2018-10-18 09:23:46 UTC  

pardon me, but where are you from?

2018-10-18 09:23:52 UTC  

singapore

2018-10-18 09:24:00 UTC  

oh, that explains it

2018-10-18 09:24:07 UTC  

?

2018-10-18 09:24:24 UTC  

Singapore has a unique way of governing compared to a lot of nations

2018-10-18 09:24:31 UTC  

yes we do

2018-10-18 09:24:42 UTC  

we don't allow corporations to intrude in the government