Okay so you change the defintion to your fucking view

Libtard tactic

It can only be state when the state itself is controlled by the workers

So it does not count

Libtard

PLUS COMPARE VENEZUELA TO A PREVIOUS SOCIALIST COUNTRY LIKE THE USSR

THERE IS OBVIOUSLY A HUGE DIFFERENCE

b0th were starving.

no difference

Provide a source

Ill burn the tip of your dick off

no im still trying to figure out the difference between socialism and communism on google

gib me 1 second pls

Socialism is where workers own the means of production in a collective way

Communism is where socialism eventually leads, which is the same thing but the state is gone due to its functions becoming obsolete over time as well as made possible by a post scarcity economy which can easily be achieved.

So basically

Socialism is a nice little heaven at first

and suddenly turns into starvation and aids

@Deleted User that is the definition

lol

Socialism is the MoP owned by the state or workers

doesn't sound good to me

And/or strong state intervention

in the economy

Nah socialism is just shit all around

Ok so basically a bunch of economists bended the term to fit their shitty view

You fucking libtard

@Muffster see these are socialist countries

Die off

NO THEY ARENT

But wait

now these are freer market countries

If you're into socialism

THEYRE EXPLOITED BY CAPITALISM

aren't you the libtard?

THOSE ARE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES

And they’re unfree economies

no, communism is against liberalism

So they’re socialist