Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 521917402330562561
Every form of government has its breaking point in terms of population size
True
some forms work well in a village or tribe where a man is personally known by every other member including the ruler
but don't work anymore when the tribe gets bigger and creates anonymity
anarcho communism for example
my roommates and I all buy and use things like milk and coffee and beer
and there's a mutual understanding and responsibility that we all do our fair part to keep the house stocked
but if I had 20 roommates instead of 2 nobody would know who was buying or using what and a parasite or ten could slip through the cracks
Good point.
Funny thing is I borrow a lot from Marx's theory though
His analysis on economics is literally the best I can find that fits my views
so you isolate his economics from his social views? how?
Egoism replaces some of those
Max Stirner's philosophy
Also, cultural Marxism isn't a thing Marx invented.
of course not, and I'm sure he'd call it a bastardization
but it does hold true to the principle of his views that inequality is evidence of oppression
which wasn't even his original idea, because the Jews preached it first
*the Jews older than him
Inequality in the economic sense is what I disagree with
We are also for agrarian and deurbanization.
But that can be modified. It is just that degeneracy tends to spread well in cities.
Decadency and Rootless Cosmopolitans
I agree with the intentions there, but I find it impractical to implement or maintain
Controlling the wealth, labor, and movement of people is far too highly invasive to result in a happy society
I think therefore that modern labor and urban systems are things to be mitigated, not destroyed.
That can be debated
Not now though.
I want to say how retarded sidisnothere is for posting an esoteric entity video in response to another video I posted.
When the person he cited from is literally degenerate
https://youtu.be/k3PHGtyNc0A
🤢
Ik
A furry pedophile
LOL
That's racist
wow
50-50