Wtf

@Mr1Gonzalez I didn’t say they were distinct im saying microeconomics are irrelevant if we’re talking about the sum of the economy. No, they don’t go “hand in hand” in this situation. One is about the whole economy, one is about how firms make decisions, therefore micro is irrelevant to us rn. Also, I said a 2 person household not a 3 person household so try not to put words in my mouth. My proof is the number of people in poverty in America, which is a massive sum (around 40 million). It’s an embarrassment to the world that we don’t care about our people, that we think of all 40 million as being lazy and smoking. Also, even if they are *all* smokers, isn’t that a massive problem?? You can’t just say “all of society does this horrible thing” and think “well they should just all change that” without thinking “why the fuck are all poor people smoking.” You’re missing the forest for the trees my dude. You’ll return with a list of 100 people that are entitled? Cool. There’s 40 million in poverty. I’ll subtract the 7 or so who are unemployed, so my list is 33 million people who are apparently lazy entitled people who are also in poverty. Let’s see your 100.

Where did you study economics? @wahx

Taken classes in high school n college. You?

Define poverty wahx

Same. However I feel that the knowledge you gained is faltered by how you debate. You said I changed the words you said and implied I said you stated “3 person home” when you said two. I advise you to read again because I stated 2-3 person home implying both accounts

What do you mean poverty as in 40 million

Nobody changed your words buddy

I said 2, you said 2-3

@wahx you’re talking about relative poverty

Which is NOT poverty

it’s relative to the median income in USA

Which is very high

Kk I know what poverty I’m talking about thanks

There’s only 2% of the population on world poverty levels

You’re talking about relative poverty

Hence why you said 40 million

So don’t put words in my mouth then and say I said “3 person home”

Yes thank you

You said 2-3

Don’t be a hypocrite

That’s incorrect

It was 2

You said I said 3

Yes, 2-3 includes 3

W o w

Yes it also includes 2

Wow!

Ok this is dumb

The point is wahx

What else can we learn today

What you’re talking about poverty

Is not poverty

I understand your view on this

You are not teaching me something

Lmao

You’re measuring income inequality , which is unrelated to the state of the economy

Yes thank you did

Then why did you use it

As a bad thing