Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 464870639862546433
Truly our greatest ally™
Syrian Government (supposedly) attacks their own citizens with chemical weapons.
Trump responds with some rather light attacks.
Imperialism. Is this what you're referring to?
Trump hasn't attacked Syria on a large scale
But it's in his interest to overthrow Assad (pbuh)
But under Assad syria is a state of religious harmony
Muslims attended Christian operas and such before the war
So why would he want him overthrown by the Islamists?
Because Israel doesn't like Assad
So the claim is that Assad is being framed for these chemical attacks in order to be ousted from the government
No but as a justification for attacking
To overthrow Assad. To oust him from the government. To replace him.
However you wish to put it
Yes
and this is a bad idea
So Trump is working with whoever carried out the chemical attacks on Syrian Citizens directly
There's no solid proof against the chemical attacks
So you're saying they never occurred?
Probably not
Still if he did do it, he's still the best option for Syria
This issue in Syria has been going on for a lot longer than Trump has been in office.
He's imperialistic and the example given is Syria. Lets say the government DID carry out chemical weapons attacks on their own citizens. Is it imperialistic to show that government that attacking their own citizens in such a way will not be tolerated and you will defend those citizens if need be?
Yes but the chemical attacks didn't happen
Can you prove that?
It's a claim so it doesn't seem like he's attacking Syria for no reason
Hol up
So he's following in Obamas footsteps in regards to Syria
But while I'm searching
I wanna know what do you think of Assad
Even if you don't like him you gotta agree he's a necessary figure right?
If Assad is behind these attacks, he is trash.
Good thing he isnt
The rebels stage a lot of shit
The 2013 attacks were proven to be carried out by rebels
I saw a pic of a boy bleeding on the ground but in another pic I saw him standing by a dead chicken
But yes, overthrowing a government or leader without making sure that leadership is replaced so things don't fall apart, is bad.
Replacing leadership is as bad if not worse than leaving a vacuum
So if Trump is behind faking these attacks in order to overthrow a government for his own benefit, he is imperialistic. Issue being that you would need solid evidence that Trump is behind it and attempting to act in the best interest of those who are victim to such attacks.
No one is alleging that Trump is behind the chemical attack
Then it's being alleged that he knows the Syrian government isn't behind it but wants Assad out anyways. Got proof of that?
That's also not being alleged.