And yeah, the mainstream media is bullshit

Especially with the whole north Korean issue

lol

And howso with that

*Trump threatens north korea*
It's reckless to threaten a nuclear power
*Trump does peace talks with north korea*
"We should nuke the fuckers lol"

Yamean no matter what Trump does they find fault with it? even if it proves they're hypocrites? yep

I mean, I hate Trump but it isn't for the hell of it

During his campaign I had a little bit of support for him

Anyways, gotta go

alright, take care

Hey fellas

So Trump is pretty imperialistic imo (attacking Syria for example), why would you support him?

Jingoism isnt interchangeable with imperialism

That's not to say it's a good thing, but let's not lazily label everything we disagree with in foreign relations as imperialism.

I assume you agree Israel is pretty gay?

The biggest of gay

Woke

Truly our greatest ally™

Syrian Government (supposedly) attacks their own citizens with chemical weapons.
Trump responds with some rather light attacks.
Imperialism. Is this what you're referring to?

Trump hasn't attacked Syria on a large scale

But it's in his interest to overthrow Assad (pbuh)

But under Assad syria is a state of religious harmony

Muslims attended Christian operas and such before the war

So why would he want him overthrown by the Islamists?

Because Israel doesn't like Assad

So the claim is that Assad is being framed for these chemical attacks in order to be ousted from the government

No but as a justification for attacking

To overthrow Assad. To oust him from the government. To replace him.

However you wish to put it

Yes

and this is a bad idea

So Trump is working with whoever carried out the chemical attacks on Syrian Citizens directly

There's no solid proof against the chemical attacks

So you're saying they never occurred?

Probably not

Still if he did do it, he's still the best option for Syria

This issue in Syria has been going on for a lot longer than Trump has been in office.

Is Trump making slight efforts to pull out of it though?

He's imperialistic and the example given is Syria. Lets say the government DID carry out chemical weapons attacks on their own citizens. Is it imperialistic to show that government that attacking their own citizens in such a way will not be tolerated and you will defend those citizens if need be?

Yes but the chemical attacks didn't happen

Can you prove that?