So what?

They didn’t charge him.

I brought it because they may not want to question the professor at all. They can, but haven’t.

They could easily indict him and have him brought over.

What’s your point anyway?

seems like a witchhunt when the dems ignore the federal laws and let people flood in without checks

what he did is minor compared to that

I never said that he didn’t deserve the sentence he got.

I don’t believe that he prevented the FBI from doing anything. The Trump Russia stuff is fake.

Notice how Papadopoulos isn’t being charged with a crime in association with him trying to get a foreign policy meeting or dirt on Hillary?

That’s because those things aren’t crimes.

Isn’t funny how Nazis and DNC shills sounds pretty much the same.

Really makes you think.

why are people who let sanctuary cities exist and aiding criminals not being tried, its a total witchhunt

Agreed.

Sessions needs to be fired

maybe even investigated himself

FBI doesnt investigate anything, its a political party

if they investigated things they would stop things like the Parkland or vegas shooter

who cares about him, he is not newsworthy

he is not even mentioned on Fox or CNN pages

Trump won fair and square

it wasnt even close

because its been proven

well, for 1 its been proven that the left cheated in historic ways, so really no need to investigate further, he won either wayy

once you remove the dead and illegal votes hillary didnt even win the popular votes

i cant help it that i'm right

i call it like it is

I was saying what the FBI said when they requested the full six month sentence

so are you

You’re asking for proof of a negative. By that standard Obama must have stolen the election too. You know, because we didn’t have an open ended FBI investigation that lasted years about it.

Prove Trump didn’t win the election fair and square. You are making the claim. Prove it.

sorry 1 person does not change an election, its retarded

exactly, goes back to my point that Trump is your president

all is well in america

the dem's are going to be embarrassed in these midterms

So you have nothing.

That’s what I thought.

What Papadopoulos did before talking to the FBI was legal. You can’t prove otherwise.

You have nothing but baseless speculation.

Wrong

lol, so wrong

George Papadopoulos didnt even do anything, and trying to link Trump to something based on no evidence is crazy dude

like you should probably go to the doctor, you might have TDS

Mueller indictment of Russians for interfering in the 2016 election. A few things about this indictment.

1. It doesn’t accuse any Americans of wrong doing. The FBI has explicitly stated that the no Americans are being accused in the press conference about this indictment. This includes Trump, and everyone in his campaign.

2. No vote is claimed to have been affected by these events.

3. The Russians are accused of making fake accounts, online personas, and RL identities to spread propaganda in favor of Black Lives Matter, Sanders and Trump. Also Facebook ads were purchased, and a few events were planned.

4. The actual crimes here are related to identity theft, fraud and the obfuscation of being foreign agents.

5. Indictments are not proof of guilt.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

Indictment of 13 Russian intelligence officers 7/13/18 . They are charged with hacking Hillary campaign members, DNC and DCCC .No American citizen is accused in this, and no effect on the election is claimed. The accused hackers are also said to have hacked Republicans and released this information along side democrat information. (Organization 1) is thought to be Wikileaks. An indictment is not proof of guilt. Most of the "evidence" used against the "Russians" is inadmissible due to chain of custody issues with the scans of the DNC server.
https://via.hypothes.is/https://www.scribd.com/document/383793138/Netyksho-Et-Al-Indictment#from_embed

Show me where Trump is indicated in either of those. You can’t.