Message from @FriarPop
Discord ID: 488407858396790785
the dem's are going to be embarrassed in these midterms
So you have nothing.
That’s what I thought.
What Papadopoulos did before talking to the FBI was legal. You can’t prove otherwise.
You have nothing but baseless speculation.
Wrong
lol, so wrong
George Papadopoulos didnt even do anything, and trying to link Trump to something based on no evidence is crazy dude
like you should probably go to the doctor, you might have TDS
Mueller indictment of Russians for interfering in the 2016 election. A few things about this indictment.
1. It doesn’t accuse any Americans of wrong doing. The FBI has explicitly stated that the no Americans are being accused in the press conference about this indictment. This includes Trump, and everyone in his campaign.
2. No vote is claimed to have been affected by these events.
3. The Russians are accused of making fake accounts, online personas, and RL identities to spread propaganda in favor of Black Lives Matter, Sanders and Trump. Also Facebook ads were purchased, and a few events were planned.
4. The actual crimes here are related to identity theft, fraud and the obfuscation of being foreign agents.
5. Indictments are not proof of guilt.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download
Indictment of 13 Russian intelligence officers 7/13/18 . They are charged with hacking Hillary campaign members, DNC and DCCC .No American citizen is accused in this, and no effect on the election is claimed. The accused hackers are also said to have hacked Republicans and released this information along side democrat information. (Organization 1) is thought to be Wikileaks. An indictment is not proof of guilt. Most of the "evidence" used against the "Russians" is inadmissible due to chain of custody issues with the scans of the DNC server.
https://via.hypothes.is/https://www.scribd.com/document/383793138/Netyksho-Et-Al-Indictment#from_embed
Show me where Trump is indicated in either of those. You can’t.
ooooh a document lol
Here’s the press conference for both indictments. In both no America, including the president, is implicated.
Rosenstien press conference on indictment of Russians in 2016 election meddling. Specificity states that no America was involved, and all parties, named and unnamed, are presumed innocent. Also says that Russians didn’t alter the election outcome.
https://youtu.be/5rAxiX8Tiu0
Rosenstien press conference on Russian hacking indictments during the 2016 election. Clearly states that no vote was changed, and the election was not effected. Also no Americans involved. Just like the previous indictments.
https://youtu.be/fAI9UpfvZmw
I’m going to do some speculation. This nazi guy is fake. He’s here to spread disinformation and troll people.
Documents Link Putin’s ‘Favorite’ Oligarch and Obama Official Who Aided Author of Anti-Trump Dossier: https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/12/documents-link-putins-favorite-oligarch-obama-official-aided-anti-trump-dossier/ I wonder where is it... I'm not buying the "theyre waiting on the IG report cuz Special counsel could get the IG report early.
Also why cry about it now, sore loser? https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/14/obama-russia-election-interference-241547
"POLITICO spoke with more than a dozen current and former officials from across the national security spectrum, including intelligence agencies, the State Department and the Pentagon. Almost all said they were aware of Russia’s aggressive cyberespionage and disinformation campaigns — especially after the dramatic Russian attempt to hack Ukrainian elections in 2014 — but felt that either the White House or key agencies were unwilling to act forcefully to counter the Russian actions."
My guess is that Mueller & Rosenstein will not be pursing the criminal case through this treaty, as they already know their evidence is based entirely on rumor and therefore useless in any proof-based courtroom. And at that point I would hope Trump would fire both Mueller and Rosenstein, as they will have proven beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt their entire investigation has been based on a partisan political attack against Trump, and not on any due diligence in accord with a criminal case?
And Obama issued EO to let all spy agencies share info, right before inaguration.. On his way out, makes u think: https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/12/obama-expands-the-nsas-ability-to-share-data-with-other-agencie/
The DOJ's indictment for Lee was for HRC email indictments and his case was also burried by FBI (in DC) during Obama rea. Russia bought that data and used it to harm Americans
https://archive.is/RDvRP The case thankfully revved up this year with followin arrest. It was languished for “unclear reasons” in obama years.
You have no evidence that Trump was involved in anything.
In addition to all this , both indictments clearly state, as do the press conferences, that not a single vote was changed. This guy is fake news.
This happened during Obama Administration
http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/07/13/gru.indictment.pdf Why didn't they do osmething about it? Obama was informed by the FBI in September, which was before Election. And they were clearly affiliated with Clinton Campaign. I wonder where was the DNC server and why FBI didnt take possesion of it. Even Putin accused them of doing it lmao. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Abq15axYtw8
@powerlifter exactly
More baseless speculation. Again you have nothing.
Oh they said they DID interefe!!!!!!!!
greatest evidence alive
So what if the NSA suspected that? They can’t prove it had any effect, and they can’t tie it to any American citizens.
Wow, some Russians bought some Facebook adds and had bots. Who fucking cares.
yeah, its such a minor impact lol
and it went both ways
Remember Hillary won the popular vote
And yeah, the Russians did pro AND anti Trump stuff. Sane with Clinton and Sanders.
Konig sure likes the mainstream narrative a lot for a radical nazi.
FBI is clearly biased. Anyone remembers lack of reporting on Obama-Hillary uranium deal scandal??? Even if we don't know a lot about the story, it shows complete lack of interest and bias from media, since the resources were there (Imagine if this was Trump) :
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-hillary-obama-russia-scandal-the-press-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about/
"According to documents unearthed by the news outlet, in 2009 the FBI had uncovered evidence of a sweeping, illegal Russian scheme to boost Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business, which included bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering. The FBI had also obtained an eyewitness account that Russian nuclear officials "had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit (the Clinton Foundation)." While the FBI was learning about these illegal Russian activities, Russia's state-owned nuclear company Rosatom was trying to acquire mining rights to 20% of the uranium in the United States through its purchase of Canadian-based Uranium One. To do so, they needed to get approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. Sitting on that committee were Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder. In 2010, the committee unanimously APPROVED the sale of Uranium One to the Russian nuclear company. In other words, while top Obama administration officials were deciding whether to hand over control of one-fifth of the nation's uranium supplies to Russia, the FBI had piles of evidence that officials at Rosatom were flagrantly violating U.S. laws and possibly compromising national security. The FBI also had evidence that officials had directed millions of dollars to Hillary Clinton's family charity, creating a clear conflict of interest.
It’s in the indictments I linked. @Deleted User
Maybe you should read them.
Documents Link Putin’s ‘Favorite’ Oligarch and Obama Official Who Aided Author of Anti-Trump Dossier
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/12/documents-link-putins-favorite-oligarch-obama-official-aided-anti-trump-dossier/
I just explained it lmfao, it happened and was reported.
It's not out of context at all. Shwos clear bias. What more do you want?
You havent provided ANY evidence whatsoever
burden of proof is on YOU.
Read the indictments I posted. I’ve done more than you have.