Message from @hcaez
Discord ID: 533137088292585503
well i'm not really sure how to show you how institutions trade more than individuals, no real research on that
but i think the best way is to look at the ownership of top companies
apple is a bit over 60%, amazon, is around 60%, alphabet is 70, netflix is over 70, facebook is over 70
the vast majority of companies are owned by institutions such as those banks i mentioned before, individuals are usually only a few percent of total holders
Trade ?
malinvestment is generated by excessive and unsustainable credit expansion to businesses and individual borrowers by the banks.
that’s my point
All due to central banks lowering interest rates and increasing money supply
percentile is a cool word
I suppose so
Imagine being conservative
🤔
Imagine thinking that just because someone has more than you that they owe you some of it
@Leo (BillNyeLand) the problem is you think wealth is distributed but it’s earned
if I worked for that extra cake then I deserve it
well again, I wasn't referring to individual ownership of stock
most companies are owned by institutions who take money from the fed
it's this investment that allows these companies to grow
They take investments
the 0% interest rates enourages this lending practice
Cheaper than borrowing from the banks ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
sometimes it can be hurtful
but during the end of obama's tenure I don't think it was
there was good growth and there still is
I’m sure it isn’t always good
But my point is it’s not like the fed is giving them money for free
It’s helps the business grow and employ/expand their workforce
so overall it’s a good investment for the fed because the more employed the more people pay in taxes etc
And plus they get the money back from the companies
well at a 0% interest rate, they are basically giving them money for free lol
hol up doing a raid
What’s wrong with income inequality
@Colonel Sanders™ 0% interest rates and cheap monetary policy
Will always cause a bust
It’s not the bust you should fear but the boom
The bust is good as it corrects the malinvestments in the economy
And by fear the boom I mean if the boom is built on a cheap credit policy , expansionary policy
But @hcaez Obama had very weak growth