I already told you my philosophy is of my own inspired thought

Not of Spengler

Spengler forms a view of history

Which happens to be correct

You’re definition of materialist is useless

And can be aligned to reality as well as my view of materialism within it

Why?

Because some materialism isn’t good nor bad. It just is.

Never assigned materialism as good or bad

There’s no point classifying it because of that.

Nor immaterialism as either

Right. Because it isn’t.

Therefor there’s no need to classify it

Good and bad are based on cultural perception

Materialism exists outside of our perception

Yes but if it doesn’t make a difference because it’s not assigned to either good or bad than it’s pointless to classify it.

That’s the issue.

No because it still exists and is something worth examining the effects of even though it cannot be classified within our limited perception.

It doesn’t mean anything in your context.

if it’s not good or bad then it cannot matter.

It just Is.

Something can exist outside our normal understanding of society but we can perceive it and examine how it affects what just is

Stop trying to classify it.

>Materializing immaterial in thought

I'm not materializing anything in thought

I'm recognizing it's existence and the absence of it

If we do not perceive it as good or bad/it does not exist as good or bad then there’s no reason to classify it. Let alone use it for the basis of anything.

It just is.

I'm confused by what you mean

So, if I understand something can exist as neither beneficial or not, it just is, so we shouldn't classify or observe it's affects

Except arguably materialism does have an effect

If materialism isn’t inherently good or bad in your definition then it’s pretty useless to use to rely on it as something of value. It’s light pointing at a human and saying “you’re a human” you’re not adding anything.

As it appears along with the degeneration of immaterialism

Which is the birthed state of society

Materialism isn't inherently bad as it cannot be altered

So there's no purpose classifying something that just is as bad or good

It simply exists

If materialism isn’t bad then why you go around calling people materialists as an insult?

However we can see how it exists more and more as society ages

Because it is an insult in so far as they are ignorant to reality outside themselves just as most people are

But it isn't necessarily bad