Message from @Leiro レイロ
Discord ID: 500740586182279189
the 3 writers on that website are the same kind of losers you meet on the lamestream media
what fact check sites do you like?
and you can't just say it sucks without explaining why...
the kind that have neutral parties doing research
that doesn't persuade me at all
ok, like...?
look up the backgrounds on the writers on Snopes
you will find they are very biased
how does one do that hahahaha
David Emery wrote this one
I found his twitter
and wouldn't all fact checkers have political views?
you can still be neutral in your work
I don't use Twitter
with good reason, I might add
Do you see the issue with just saying "this website sucks it's biased" and then not attempting to explain why and doing no work yourself?
Makes it seem like you just don't like seeing opposing views and are too lazy to challenge them
ok so at the bottom of this page it says "click here to get my daily TRUMP newsletter" and you say my shit is biased
there's also no evidence on this page that the work of snopes, in any way, is unprofessional, other than being associated with liberals. They need to provide evidence of snopes articles that are poorly done for me to think that snopes is poorly done
@LadyAquanine that second one defended snopes
it was in favor of it
tbh they are okay sources not not really reliable.
but*
ok the third one cites literally nothing
as does the third one
Snopes can not be trusted as the end-all of truth and info
no... but it does cite shit
it actually tries to inform people
if you want, you can use it to show one side of the story, and use several other fact-checking websites to back up what you are researching
and yeah @Leiro レイロ I'll respond to dms soon
that's true, want me to find other sources for why george soros is not a nazi sympathizer?
want me to find some about what his agenda is?