There's so many topics being thrown around

George soros

@wahx because its interconnected

ok what, is george soros just your boogyman hahaha

no

ok can you link some sources I'm bewildered rn

he's a Hungarian Jewish guy who sold out his Jewish friends to Nazis in WWII, and is a wanted man in his native Hungary

I'm genuinely having a hard time keeping up with all the different connections you're throwing around

can I just dm you instead?

or smth

he's an insanely rich anus who has been funding all sorts of evil movements through his front companies

@wahx

dm?

he's no boogey-man

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/ that's not true @LadyAquanine

you really put stock into the losers on that site?

the 3 writers on that website are the same kind of losers you meet on the lamestream media

what fact check sites do you like?

and you can't just say it sucks without explaining why...

the kind that have neutral parties doing research

that doesn't persuade me at all

ok, like...?

look up the backgrounds on the writers on Snopes

you will find they are very biased

how does one do that hahahaha

David Emery wrote this one

I found his twitter

and wouldn't all fact checkers have political views?

you can still be neutral in your work

I don't use Twitter

with good reason, I might add

Do you see the issue with just saying "this website sucks it's biased" and then not attempting to explain why and doing no work yourself?

Makes it seem like you just don't like seeing opposing views and are too lazy to challenge them

http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes/

@wahx

ok so at the bottom of this page it says "click here to get my daily TRUMP newsletter" and you say my shit is biased

i somewhat explained it in dms

https://www.wnd.com/2009/03/91196/

there's also no evidence on this page that the work of snopes, in any way, is unprofessional, other than being associated with liberals. They need to provide evidence of snopes articles that are poorly done for me to think that snopes is poorly done

https://www.wnd.com/2007/05/41537/

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/swank/090313