What does a terrorist attack have to downright capitalist

Sure let’s talk about their martial arts then

it’s not relevant to economics right now

Another fallacy

You honestly can't do anything but say my sources are wrong yet you commit appeal to authority with all capitalist sources, especially Mises.

Strawman

It's called strawman, retarded boomer

Learn your fallacy

lol?

That makes no sense

You talked about a massacre when we were talking about economic reforms

like what relevance does it have

"I don't understand why you think communism is a good thing unless you want things handed to you for free"
This is a strawman

He’s right tbh

Yet it's not

It's a fallacy

why not

It isn't

Text spam

Condense or summarize it

Wow, that thing itself is a strawman in the first paragraph

Now time for my evidence

***Article 12 of the Soviet Constitution***

In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: "He who does not work, neither shall he eat."

The principle applied in the U.S.S.R. is that of socialism: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."

“Neither shall eat” yet they gave them “free housing “ pretty sure

Not an argument ^

and work was forced

Work is forced under Capitalism

Work is a necessity and has been in every single mode of production

It's forced under both capitalism and socialism

By your own logic you advocate for lazy people

You get money under socialism

It's called Ruble wages, same as USD

Work is not forced under capitalism

Money is everything under capitalism

yes

Work is not forced

Work is forced

Nope

You can try not working now

Nobody will force you

implying he isn't already a neet