and 727

it was obvious

the same goes for the B29

AIM-9

B-1

and a shit load of others

This isn't a good argument when your only source is CIA

Not to mention your fallacy is called "appeal to authority"

CIA is a good source

this was an intelligence report anyways

if you knew millitary you would understand how copied it was

Yet again, appeal to authority fallacy

argumentum ad verecundiam

Don't care about your sidestepping

But

It's called your logical fallacy

Dipshit

"American AIM-9B Sidewinder missile marked the beginning of a breakthrough in the development of Soviet air-to-air missiles. The missile, fired from a Taiwanese F-86 Sabre aircraft, lodged without exploding in a Chinese MiG-17. The missile was sent to Toropov's engineering office to be copied"

Not only was American tech a decade or so ahead

mostly

they had to copy to stay competitive

No actual source other than a propaganda agency that's main focus is attempting to overthrow South American governments for being socialist.

Nah it's a good source

intelligence report

Yeah, your fallacy makes your claim invalid tho

Reagan did tighten this industrial espionage

as in trying to stop it

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority

And don't forget the MIG-15 required British engines

in the war they played "buddy buddy" with the west

hence why so much western tech flowed in

And don't forget your fallacy

It's not a fallacy
The Soviets were propped up by decades of successful, industrial espionage and western capital coming in from private banks such as Goldman Sachs which allowed them to stay within 1 & less -- a half generation -- of our own state of the art.

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ ignoring your clear fallacy "The CIA said it so it must be true!"

Well this was an intelligence report

Seems reliable

the CIA source wise is reliable

Hitlers documents on the Holocaust seem reliable

Their intelligence skills are damn good

Hitlers policy and documents against Jews seem reliable

As always, you're wrong.