<:FOX:475770812159492096> <:confederate:475778331141210134> <:AlphaObunga:475854946428911636>

yeah but most politicians have one or two pet issues and are esily swayed by cash on all the other ones

^

it's very high impact

on the aggregate

How are autist rights within conservative circles lmao

They may be swayed on very particular and local issues such as building a bridge, but you won’t see a Republican suddenly opposing tax cuts because that would anger their base.

@God’s Morals that may be true (it is), but my point from the beggining is not against upper-class existing. but against the freedom for anyone to become one (equal oportunity). which basically is handing over your country to foreign investors/nations. politics may still appear to be the same, but economic decisions by very rich people will benefit other countries, not their own.

you don't get what I'm saying hold on

The house went to the Democrats because house elections are local and get no national coverage.

Just research basic economics templar

It's that they won't be swayed on taxes because it's their core issue, but when verizon offers them money to back 5g they think nothing of it

the problem with having a socialist on chat is that debate level can't go very high...

It was swayed by minorities and women

they take money in exchange for their vote on issues they dont care about

Capitalism only works when you're a huge country like the USA

@Deleted User exactly my point!!!

All Europeans are economically cucked because of their country's sizes

go read a book or talk to a girl or something Templar

or just go to bed

They aren’t swayed on highly public national issues, typically. Now, some politicians do change and alternate in their stances on the major issues, but this is mostly always a result of genuine ideological development or posturing to voters, not corporate interests.

yeah that's just not factually correct

you've got a rosy view of washington

I guess that's still better than being a commie

well, a lot of economic decisions by upper class need no permission from politics... but I fear we aren't even debating the same thing. it seems we don't exactly disagree, we just are trying to prove different things, lol.

Gotta defend those people in gated communities *cough*rich liberals*cough*

anyway, what is your point exactly @God’s Morals ? what system do you defend?

What if you have an upper class which is entirely liberal and invests millions in liberal political causes?

I am a national capitalist

Do you still not tax the rich?

They create jobs

you mean a nationalist?

Trump is rich

you defend the principles of freedom that your nation has

Lol

Cuck to liberal elites

Yeah, but national capitalist rolls off the tongue better.

ok.

you don't sabotage your whole nation just to hinder some rich jews

Capitalists care more about making money than politics.

Good night lads thanks for the compelling conversations <:GWcmeisterPeepoLove:403295311189245952>