I don't think theres a point in supporting traditionalism, it would take a lot for those ideas to be re-implemented.

What I would argue for is a hands-off approach to governing expression, with the capacity to crack down on destructive movements

I dislike the concept of inquisition and surveilance

I would not look for windows into men's souls, you might say

Well the capacity to crack down requires an authoritarian government

yes

And of course, I'm not calling for a orwellian state. More so a monarchy with the reserved authoritarian force when necessary.

an authoritarian government that does not involve itself where it doesn't have to is ideal

also military service should be mandatory

for men

The Calvinist Republic of early America had no power to crack down on harmful things, and it never did as it evolved.

America is not ideal

I do still respect it as an effort that was good in many ways

Well yeah that's how most pre-reformation monarchies worked anywayz

*anyways

They didn't monitor everything

yeah but they had no fair courts

no enabling law for business

They did though,

modern enabling law was first implemented in america

at its founding

They had laws regulating commerce,

And they had a guild system to control the economy

those are not enabling laws

Enabling laws?

What enabling laws?

enabling laws are contract arbitration, corporate structure, etc

the things that made modern industry and the resulting science and technology possible

How did America contribute here? All America made was a Constitution.

Modern industry and science could exist without the enlightenment or reformation

I disagree but I don't want to argue the point

Fair enough

is that gay boy still spamming

what a worthless individual

Were all worthless

begone nihilist

At least gay is getting laid

Begone, thot!

My ex is a thot.

My ex is a thot

Jelly