Message from @ventuz

Discord ID: 528267960817811476


2018-12-28 17:39:58 UTC  

they already do

2018-12-28 17:40:00 UTC  

use force

2018-12-28 17:40:07 UTC  

taxation

2018-12-28 17:41:10 UTC  

But if they weren’t big enough to go tyrannical, then there is no way they could stop a decent sized group of people from banding together and looting a city

2018-12-28 17:41:12 UTC  

No?

2018-12-28 17:43:25 UTC  

Private police exists

2018-12-28 17:43:30 UTC  

Not too sure about anarcho capitalism

2018-12-28 17:43:32 UTC  

not one myself

2018-12-28 17:43:58 UTC  

What? IF who wasnt big enough? And yes the could go tyrannical but what would be the point of that first of all. And the second thing, as i've stated private firms, different private firms would go against these people. If you're stating that it is impossible for, lets say a high number of firms who have a high number of people working for them as militias, how is it possible for a normal military? It is more of less the same thing however those firms have high incentives to innovate and keepo the costs low since competition, the only difference is that since competition would exist, a single firm would not get as organized as the gov

2018-12-28 17:44:02 UTC  

and monopolise force

2018-12-28 17:44:07 UTC  

thats the whole point of anarcho capitalism

2018-12-28 17:44:44 UTC  

they wouldnt get tyrannical since they wouldnt be a monopoly

2018-12-28 17:45:33 UTC  

and yeah private police exists but theyre never gonna get as popular

2018-12-28 17:46:06 UTC  

for now

2018-12-28 17:46:09 UTC  

since theres gov

2018-12-28 17:47:21 UTC  

Or how about a scenario where a large army takes over an area and security companies aren’t able to combat it

2018-12-28 17:47:46 UTC  

Or how about a scenario where a large army takes over an area and government military isn't able to combat it

2018-12-28 17:47:59 UTC  

Thats a civil war

2018-12-28 17:48:01 UTC  

They happen

2018-12-28 17:48:09 UTC  

But they would be much rarer

2018-12-28 17:48:16 UTC  

why

2018-12-28 17:48:26 UTC  

why would they be rare and those wouldnt

2018-12-28 17:49:08 UTC  

Because when you have much smaller companies, they aren’t able to combat groups like that as well

2018-12-28 17:49:21 UTC  

how

2018-12-28 17:49:55 UTC  

since they have more incentives

2018-12-28 17:49:57 UTC  

Because the companies are weaker than a large centralized army

2018-12-28 17:50:08 UTC  

profits, competition, innovation etc

2018-12-28 17:50:21 UTC  

no how are they weaker

2018-12-28 17:50:25 UTC  

those have more incentives

2018-12-28 17:50:29 UTC  

and

2018-12-28 17:50:33 UTC  

they could not get tyrannical

2018-12-28 17:50:42 UTC  

since they wouldnt ever be able to form a monopoly

2018-12-28 17:50:51 UTC  

how are they weaker

2018-12-28 17:51:10 UTC  

Because they don’t have as many recourses

2018-12-28 17:51:21 UTC  

To build a significantly sized force

2018-12-28 17:51:34 UTC  

how do they not have as many recourses? how does the gov have

2018-12-28 17:51:53 UTC  

Because the government is an entire nation

2018-12-28 17:53:36 UTC  

What? Yes? And that is my point. They have a monopoly on basically everything. What stops them from going tyrannical. So to answer your other "question" about them nto being as effective. Those companies would be able to get to these resources, since nothing would stop them from getting them since they have incentives since competition. So they would be as effective as the government military

2018-12-28 17:54:10 UTC  

even more

2018-12-28 17:54:11 UTC  

probably

2018-12-28 17:54:43 UTC  

not probably for sure