Message from @ventuz

Discord ID: 528265059680649226


2018-12-28 17:31:07 UTC  

yes

2018-12-28 17:32:25 UTC  

how would we have more control of the gov if there is no gov

2018-12-28 17:32:26 UTC  

lol

2018-12-28 17:33:27 UTC  

I mean what’s to stop say 10,000 people from banding together and looting a small town

2018-12-28 17:33:53 UTC  

private firms that have a hold of private militias?

2018-12-28 17:33:57 UTC  

where on earth did that come from?

2018-12-28 17:34:02 UTC  

same thing that stops them now

2018-12-28 17:34:09 UTC  

We just say the gov causes monopolies

2018-12-28 17:34:33 UTC  

sid

2018-12-28 17:34:37 UTC  

No he was suggesting anarcho capitalism earlier

2018-12-28 17:34:58 UTC  

why do you have the role american if you said youre from the uk like 10 mins ago

2018-12-28 17:35:02 UTC  

what

2018-12-28 17:35:06 UTC  

yes

2018-12-28 17:35:11 UTC  

were talking about anarcho capitalism here?

2018-12-28 17:35:27 UTC  

cause I leveld up

2018-12-28 17:35:36 UTC  

o

2018-12-28 17:35:57 UTC  

Whats to stop these companies from charging ludicrously high prices for protection?

2018-12-28 17:36:02 UTC  

Competition

2018-12-28 17:36:05 UTC  

and they won't get sales

2018-12-28 17:36:38 UTC  

competition

2018-12-28 17:36:44 UTC  

and no one would buy t hem

2018-12-28 17:36:52 UTC  

other companies would take advantage of the situation

2018-12-28 17:36:55 UTC  

and sell at lower prices

2018-12-28 17:37:04 UTC  

and boom demand

2018-12-28 17:38:30 UTC  

If they are big enough to actually protect large groups of people effectively, competition can be squashed in areas

2018-12-28 17:38:57 UTC  

And would they not be able to forcibly take property from people?

2018-12-28 17:39:31 UTC  

Nope

2018-12-28 17:39:44 UTC  

no that would be a monopoly what youre talking about. And monopolies are impossible in free markets as ive stated. And they wouldn't. That argument could be appliked to the gov

2018-12-28 17:39:51 UTC  

The gov can foprcibly take property from peopel

2018-12-28 17:39:52 UTC  

right now

2018-12-28 17:39:58 UTC  

they already do

2018-12-28 17:40:00 UTC  

use force

2018-12-28 17:40:07 UTC  

taxation

2018-12-28 17:41:10 UTC  

But if they weren’t big enough to go tyrannical, then there is no way they could stop a decent sized group of people from banding together and looting a city

2018-12-28 17:41:12 UTC  

No?

2018-12-28 17:43:25 UTC  

Private police exists

2018-12-28 17:43:30 UTC  

Not too sure about anarcho capitalism

2018-12-28 17:43:32 UTC  

not one myself

2018-12-28 17:43:58 UTC  

What? IF who wasnt big enough? And yes the could go tyrannical but what would be the point of that first of all. And the second thing, as i've stated private firms, different private firms would go against these people. If you're stating that it is impossible for, lets say a high number of firms who have a high number of people working for them as militias, how is it possible for a normal military? It is more of less the same thing however those firms have high incentives to innovate and keepo the costs low since competition, the only difference is that since competition would exist, a single firm would not get as organized as the gov

2018-12-28 17:44:02 UTC  

and monopolise force

2018-12-28 17:44:07 UTC  

thats the whole point of anarcho capitalism