Message from @Indigo

Discord ID: 541201487930458112


2019-02-02 10:11:39 UTC  

I do hate the way some people will ignore the issues of men in order to promote feminism

2019-02-02 10:12:06 UTC  

And I'm against misandrists of course

2019-02-02 10:12:49 UTC  

Being against feminism means being against what feminism had done and continues to do

2019-02-02 10:13:16 UTC  

They give a rats ass about men's issues

2019-02-02 10:13:38 UTC  

It feels like an overgeneralisation

2019-02-02 10:14:54 UTC  

Everything they had done for men is "teaching them to cry more and combating toxic masculinity"

2019-02-02 10:15:04 UTC  

You can check menslib if you want

2019-02-02 10:15:40 UTC  

Almost all of their activism centers among combating toxic masculinity and teaching men to cry

2019-02-02 10:16:05 UTC  

Do you think that a person can be a feminist as well as an MRA?

2019-02-02 10:16:19 UTC  

Or do you disagree with the common definition of feminism?

2019-02-02 10:17:41 UTC  

I believe a person can be both feminist and an mra. Feminism had done good for women. I do believe that both movements are necessary for a non lopsided world

2019-02-02 10:18:18 UTC  

But modern feminist activists aren't doing much for men. Is that basically your view?

2019-02-02 10:18:39 UTC  

Because I would agree that there's too much division

2019-02-02 10:18:48 UTC  

Feminists need to stop the bs that "FemiInism sTands For men tOO

2019-02-02 10:18:50 UTC  

People don't think they can support both sides

2019-02-02 10:19:15 UTC  

Yeah, popular feminist movements don't do too much for the dudes.

2019-02-02 10:19:38 UTC  

They do hurt men though

2019-02-02 10:19:52 UTC  

Read the answer by Karen Straughan

2019-02-02 10:20:00 UTC  

Sure thing

2019-02-02 10:21:20 UTC  

I believe that men's movement shouldn't ever be a subsidiary of feminism.

2019-02-02 10:21:29 UTC  

We won't get anywhere

2019-02-02 10:21:41 UTC  

I agree

2019-02-02 10:21:52 UTC  

More people need to be ready to join in on both sides

2019-02-02 10:21:54 UTC  

Two independent movements are necessary for equality to be attained

2019-02-02 10:22:03 UTC  

Right

2019-02-02 10:22:12 UTC  

What we see today is lopsided equality

2019-02-02 10:22:14 UTC  

Independent but not divided by goal

2019-02-02 10:22:33 UTC  

That's fundamentally a bastardization of equality

2019-02-02 10:23:22 UTC  

I think that Elizabeth Coast's case is terrible

2019-02-02 10:23:33 UTC  

I think she should be getting at least as long as he was gonna get.

2019-02-02 10:24:59 UTC  

Wrongful sexual assault claims are really disgusting

2019-02-02 10:25:16 UTC  

Sorry for changing the topic a bit.

2019-02-02 10:37:26 UTC  

These are some of the problems, 'the feminists claim that 'false accusations are soooo negligible' and the 'fgm cannot be even compared to mgm'
They also believe that women are the ones shafted by the justice system

2019-02-02 11:18:24 UTC  

@~Red~ What I meant was that the feminist movement itself would latch on to whatever lets it survive in a given climate - not that it's a monolith. Though it does have militants who direct it. The problem with feminism is that it is not Egalitarian in its outlook. I see the MRM as being Egalitarian with a current focus on men - not as the equal opposite of feminism. Feminists do see us as being the opposite - but we don't have those theories about women that feminists have about men. We only ever talk about Toxic Femininity as a way to mock the idea that Masculinity is Toxic. We don't have theories about women's sexual organs, and we don't think in terms of oppressor/oppressed. We aren't centered around power either. If our major goals were achieved tomorrow, most of the movement would disolve. Not so with feminism.

2019-02-02 11:19:06 UTC  

I can understand that

2019-02-02 15:29:55 UTC  

Anyone see this?

2019-02-02 15:30:14 UTC  

reddit /u/Intaction posted a new self post in /r/MensRights
Couple of papers that show domestic violence symmetry - https://redd.it/amdff7

Page 2:

>460 men and women were examined out of whom 69.1% of men and 74.3% of women were subject to physical violence; 72.6% of men and 73.5% o...

2019-02-02 18:11:57 UTC  

Excellent source!

2019-02-02 20:35:14 UTC  

Found at B&N. Starting em off young.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/523922218200203265/541355935399018539/image0.jpg

2019-02-02 20:39:55 UTC  

*Why have any men at all?' wrote Sally Miller Gearhart in a 1982 manifesto titled `The Future–If There Is One–Is Female.' Gearhart is an advocate of ovular merging, a process that involves the mating of two eggs, which has been successfully accomplished with mice. Only female offspring are produced. I've always worried that one day women would figure out how to get along without us and they would be able to reproduce unilaterally, like sponges. It's not genocide, exactly. It's more like job attrition, the way employers cut back positions without actually firing anyone. `A 75 per cent female to 25 percent male ratio could be achieved in one generation if one half of a population reproduced heterosexually and one half by ovular merging.' according to Gearhart. `Such a prospect is attractive to women who feel that if they bear sons, no amount of love and care and non-sexist training will save those sons from culture where male violence is institutionalized.*