It’s a good test to comment in a main sub and see the reactions

Yeah, I've seen one or two. I think we need to link them to our movement somehow because it will link people to the wider issues

Check my last comment, it’s doing well, pleased to see

Posting pro MRA things in none MRA subs is a good thing, it's how people hear about the issues and can become more interested in them. Even if they get downvoted, it can sometimes help people think

And hopefully show people they aren’t alone in their thoughts

People will see a logical and reasonable statement that goes along with their own observations

All and all I think we have an excellent subreddit. I like how we stay non political to

Journalist who backed unproven rape accuser settles libel case - http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=6224
No one taunt @davidhencke on Twitter.

tbh the only time MRM will ever become accepted is if it becomes useful for the people in power to pursue

which - since their income and their jobs are directly based on the current narrative

aint happenin', chief

This may well be the Red Pill Movie for Divorce. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnO-wMgQY1cKnAgqGR4JYCA

Basically, this guy contacted me over Twitter. What I've seen on his account so far seems very legitimate , though he only has four videos.

Tell me what you think.

I think those in power react to social trends. They couldn’t ignore us if we groto a certain point

but the issue is that - in the information age, and in every time period before that

It’s all about branding; politics to, think about campaign slogans and signs

the spread of ideas has always been mostly reliant on those in power

mind you, generally speaking "anti-establishment" ideas spread farther, but ideas of slight reform just generally don't without government support

and i don't think any government has any reason to want to guarantee equal rights between the sexes

imo women have always been the more privileged class

also, @Men Are Human , if you've seen their website, looks pretty damn legit

https://mandownthedocumentary.com/

Something I find very annoying is that if you google “circumcision sensitivity”, the top results are mostly that BS study from that Canadian feminist. She was blatantly misleading to present it as if it doesn’t cause any loss of sensivity

It’s the most awkward MR topic but could actually be a very quick way to wake people up

@blueorange22 I'm writing an article on circumcision. Do you want to add in a bit about the study?

Shouldn't be hard to debunk - what would she even know about having a circumcised penis?

Yeah I was thinking of doing that

Makiing it a reddit post.

I have possibly enough info for two articles on it currently.

Or one huge FAQ

When I search reddit and browse by recent threads it’s the one topic people are firmly pro-MRA on. Even some pro SJW subs are divided

We just have to package the presentation the right way

Funnily enough though, even some people who call themselves MRA don't recognise the practice as harmful, and often say things like 'I had it done and I'm happy about it'. So it's not only contentious among feminist types, but to some degree within the MRM as well.

I don't really know how to bring those types around, most don't seem to listen in the circumcision threads I've seen

I see that to. I don’t like talking about it but I hate that when I see it

I think the best way is to talk about the anatomy of the removed tissue; the frenulum, the Melisandre corpuscles, etc. direct biology based arguments. Someone might not care if they don’t think there’s any adverse affect

Meissners*

I've seen people mention that the foreskin contains thousands of nerve ends conductive to pleasure, they respond with something like 'lol I enjoy sex just fine thank you' -_- which misses the point entirely that it's still not what they would have, but it's what they reply with

An insecurity with their own bodies probably prevents them listening to logic

And denial, they don’t want to believe it