I was going to type that just now

From each...

But

If there is no incentive to get rich, people don't work harder

They'll fall into the trap of mediocrity

The world's progress would stall

well the basis would be that the ones who work harder have better life conditions than the ones who don't

But isn't it incompatible with their idea of equality

With more automation it can certainly be possible. As in star trek, the goal becomes to better yourself, not an endless accumulation of things

Communism has, so far, been a tool of political ponerology (government of manipulators) it’s a means of control...it poses as being “for the worker”, but it’s the opposite, it enslaved the worker to work for the government.

@S8N my main problem with communism is something else.

@blueorange22 i agree

It's probably like 'no true communist' but the examples in the modern world don't have to be that way

Communists will tell you that authoritarianism is temporary evil before attaining statelessness

But in reality, the stateless classless society will never happen and it's a trap to make common people to voluntarily give them power.

Golden bait

Plus, consider how communism and feminism are aligned/intertwined...that’s telling in itself

@S8N If we remove money from the equation of society. We are making a more unequal world.

Think of it...

Money is a great leveler, if a man doesn't have the looks or height, he could compensate it with money.

If you remove money, that leveler will be lost. People will be judged more on his height and his appearance

Let me explain this in the case study of India.

There is a system called caste

oh god i'll tell him that and he'll just call me an incel

Which is an inequality based on birth

There are low castes and high castes

Low castes are considered untouchable

But money reigns Supreme in a capitalist ic society

So the low caste people who made money got considerable power and respect

And ceased to be untouchables

If money was out of the equation, think of it

by the way, what's your takes on this?

computer jobs are currently very sought for. but, in around 3-4 years, most kids (who already are aiming for said job) will take that job, and thus lower the demand for it, thus lowering pay significantly.

Is it a sound job and I'm being paranoid or is it a possibility?

You know, the demand would only increase

When computer was becoming mainstream there was a lot of pushback against it from trade unions and such that they'll decrease jobs

i'm talking about general jobs like technicians and programmers. things that currently exist now and are in very high demand

But as technology progressed computers itself made new job prospects

Even if automation takes many jobs, other avenues in tech would open

Blockchain, quantum

It'll go on

Technology won't end to automation

New innovations are necessary and that needs humans

A very interesting take on that. Thank you

So you're saying that, technically, computer jobs like programming, etc. will always be in high demand due to technological advances

Yes