"guns germs and steel" is my favorite for this kinda analysis but you might also get a benefit from "the dictators handbook"
norway also benefits enormously from oil deposits and rich resource deposits and have leveraged these fantastically to make up for a historical lag in european development.
as kaz points out theres no reason to believe that climate effects intelligence and typically what we see is nutrition being the major cause of difference in intelligence between populations. Japan for quite a while had a significantly shorter population until their economy developed to the degree that they could reliably import food. we see much the same with iq differences

you know norway started to benefit from oil in 1970s

and norway was developed long before that, it was poor but it was developed

you cant just change race, thousands of generations of environment conditions went into race

they didnt have rape gangs and massive overpopulating

when you take a race out of that environment, they wont change quick

The environmental demands shape genetic specialization

And dictate what is selectively competitive

thats the whole point

we dont want jungle optimized nogs in our lands

we already live here

and we dont want to pay for their evolution in our lands

@CronoSaturn join VC

diversity itself isnt weakness and science consistently shows that frequently diversity exists to maximise benefit over a wide possibility space. without diversity populations are unable to adapt to changing conditions and are exposed as a monolith to the same perils, diversity allows that monolith to be less exposed and to make beneficial use of niche capabilities.
race is not a largely impactful factor as the growth of asia has shown in accounting for a nations success and is a pretty poor predictive factor in isolation of outcomes

we are under 0 obligation to pay for nogs evolution

your not. your getting paid

"race is not a largely impactful factor as the growth of asia has shown in accounting for a nations success and is a pretty poor predictive factor in isolation of outcomes
"

What are you even saying?

Also genetic specialization is objectively stronger for trait expression than genetic diversity and the dulling of trait expression

You're*

these neegros are a snapshot of all the factors that went into their race

and you cant change the snapshot

without spending alot of resources and time

that would take away from our own welbeing

as white nations

they are frozen in time

just like we are

Your genetic traits, so long as they are selected for, will be passed on forever

They don't go away

historically asians were seen as an inferior and less developed race and the growth of japan, china and korea dispell this notion pretty handily.
race in isolation of other factors is not useful in predicting outcomes as other factors, class, education, upbringing, nutrition, etc are more useful in predicting those outcomes.
genetic diversity is the collection of a number of specialties across a population. Your genes are not effected by who enters or leaves society and visa versa. If you fuck and produce kids then clearly whatever you and your partner have were good enough so you have more of that and on it goes.

and where is this frozen in time bullshit? we're chatting away on discord, some of us on iPhones. I didnt have these growing up

my genetic traits are often the result of blocks of snps which is not how genes are passed on, being an almost random scramble of 50% of my and 50% of the mother's dna. as such theres plenty of traits that will not be shared between me and my offspring. As dominant and recessive traits are also a thing it is fully possible that the child may present traits inherited from me that I don't exhibit.

for example the chances are low that if i have kids they'll agree with me that cilantro tastes like soap

being gay is mental health disorder. The mental health departments must take care of it. There is nothing to be proud of having a retarded mental health, except of the success they achieve in their ignorance!

Mental health “treatment” of homosexuality is ineffective and, as shown by Alan Turing, impacts the the ability for otherwise highly functional members of society to contribute. Such action is counter productive and so our efforts should be directed elsewhere

I leave this here

That’s gross but whether that remains true in the wake of CRISPR remains to be seen. In any case, the efficacy of the current policy is high with lower suicide rates, more active participation and lower anti-social activity (drug use etc). It’s not for me, but I’ve no intent of paying the cost to prevent others.

CRISPr wouldn't be able to change your sex after birth though?

nope

crispr works by changing small parts of small sections of DNA in single cells

even if you could use crispr on that scale