Message from @AdorableStormtrooper
Discord ID: 522048091591802890
its obvious that communism is the superior ideology!
long live the Vanguard of Lenin and Marx!
<:bait:520002653439262721>
utterly btfoed by a single emote
<:bait:520002653439262721>
except I'm not btfo'd in the slightest. you are allowing my accusations to go unopposed 😁
not a single counter argument was heard
not one
i reign supreme
<:bait:520002653439262721>
very gay
uh, no
more like
the best ideology
alt-right racial identitarianism is literally the most contrived ideology ever
pro-capitalist too
eww
>pro-capitalism
<:brainlet:508484031625691156>
^
capitalism as a goal in and of itself is 💩
that is, most people here are opposed to the private ownership of means of production? wew, wasn't aware that I'm surrounded by literal socialists! in that case....
**Салют, товарищи!**
no, not entirely for it either. best economy is a protectionist one. meaning the private individuals of your nation come first. Taking from these private individuals and giving it off to the public sector is pretty much you flushing ur economy down a toilet. Now you're free to tax foreign companies as much as you want and get your gibs that way
so capitalism then
as I suspected
mixed rather
after all the economy is predicated there on private ownership of means of production
what you are proposing is some kind of right-wing version of social democracy
but still capitalism
the only non-capitalist movements are socialist ones, because socialists are the only people who reject private ownership of means of production. therefore yours is not in any way a movement skeptical of capitalism, merely a more mixed form of it
perhaps "moderate capitalism" would be a good term
"national capitalism" comes to mind too
ok, if the private individual behaves like utter shit and goes against the national interest, his shit can be seized
so fuck u soros
well sure, I get that this is what you want. I just maintain that this in no way escapes the sphere of capitalism. indeed, "national capitalism" should be a good term - capitalism subjected to the *raison d'etat* of the nation
its grossly inferior to socialism though
the capitalist still needs to be a socialist man and the gov't can't lean too much on the man
a capitalist cannot be a socialist; nor vice versa. I'm not sure I follow what you are saying?
I'm explaining an ideal, that's very implausible
anyway, he can't only look how to satisfy his bottom line but also to preserve the culture around him.
work has to be hard as well. otherwise people will get lazy