That's not really reasonable. Marx specifically said that, as the new system emerges from the confines of the old, it will reproduce some of its flaws. The means of production were in the hands of the workers via the regional economic councils; the economy was planned; there didn't exist a single trace of private initiative in the economy. What it was, was an economy moving onward on the path towards communsim. Now, it made mistakes (the Khrushchev era is more valuable for the general direction of the USSR during this period than it is for the leadership skills of the actual man in question), but under no circumstances can an honest man call it capitalist, state or otherwise. There was no capitalist relation in existence in USSR during this period; not property relation, not in terms of initiative and not in terms of planning of production.

Relax, I was just shitposting

....you fucking revisionist

I should be calling you that

REEEEEEEEEEE

@Space Bird

christ, trump always has body armor on..... this should not be needed, but it is. watching the bush funeral

Funny Stalin never needed body armor

? @Deleted User

Ahh, I mistyped it

I actually did mean @spacebitch now that I think about it

no step on bird snek, just saying, its not nice

Ill fucking step wherever I want

Fuck your property rights

<:ree:520000441036046336>

"property rights"

What a joke

There is no such thing as property or morals, youre getting nuked and youre going to like it

Spook 200%

Damn son, hit right in the fucking property myth

too late

I already stole

L

Damn

Your property is gone now

woke pill, the cental planners of the 70-90's thought they were correct, and their bastard followers thought they inhereted their ideals and continued it on. they were wrong, but their predecessors were both wrong and corrupted

Ill use this then

@Space Bird Shut the fuck up with your nonsense

no u

@Pinochet Shut the fuck up liberal

Be kind to your friendly neighborhood boomer @Deleted User

I'm a 12yo anarchist

Fuck off will ye m8