we're not

It's not but Europe does share a common history

white european (caucasian) is a race

What's the difference between a race and ethnicity

Europeans are drom the caucuses

that has many ethnicities within it but still not an ethnicity

Indo-European makes more sense

There is the American white ethnicity

@Nikitis Race is whatever you want it to be

Point is America started a s a racialist white state

The exact terms not the important part

race is irrelevant nearly always

pan european state

or rather anglo in the beginning

^ anti european

sure anglo state

I have seen many LARPers say that America was a racialist white state with no evidence or substance to this claim.

yeah i don't believe it

it wasn't, it was very anarchic at the start

? was it?

There were laws on the books that non whites couldn't immigarte

I don't know when these laws got put on the books exactly

what do you mean by anarchic?

The long-term plan was for blacks to become eventual citizens by being born into American citizenship (freedom of womb), they had to make the necessary concessions to the southern planters. With this in mind, how can you reconcile the 1790 Naturalization law?

There won't be a white ethno/racial state. That's the point. Unless the country splits its land with the other races.

It's just bad history and it's dumb. As cool as it would be it's FAKE news.

as in anarchy was prevalent

it wasn't called "the wild west" for no reason

The founding fathers were racist for sure but not pro-slavery and wanted to extend citizenship to all Americans living in America at that time eventually.

OHHH

The first statute in the United States to codify naturalization law. Alternately known as the Nationality Act, the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to "any alien, being a free white person." @εïз irma εïз

you're talking about that era

okay ye

I already addressed this loser.

Because this is like the only thing people ever have to substantiate the claim.

the moment first settlers arrived really

It ignores the historical context completely.

isn't the wild west the reason libertarianism is so romanticised in america?

Sorry

The White settlers had some pretty negative views of Natives

It would be like saying that the 3/5ths compromise meant the Founding Fathers were pro-slavery.