are you saying he will be depressed if that person died and he did not save him?

I said a chance, because that would be a somewhat egoistic motive, to not go sick for your inaction. But even then, it's a problem caused by altruism

no it is not

it is caused by the reasons l listed up above. or it could be because it is his job. In this case, he should do that, because he is being payed to do it. Again, an egoistic motive

or some other reason

Welcome

No, in the listed case he's a soldier, he has no financial incentive to save someone

This is not a VIP case

What is the debate?

Egoism

no. that is incorrect. a lot of people are soldeirs because they cannot provide themselves in any other way

he believes altruism exists, i think it does not

Cool down and read the situation again

? cool down ?

You don't lose your job because you keep shooting at the enemy instead of saving a fellow trooper

Actually saving that trooper might cost your job

no you do not understand

he is payed to do so

He is not, a soldier is paid to follow orders, and saving a complete stranger while not being ordered to do so is not doing your job as a soldier

What is egoism

As far as I'm aware, it's the philosophy of doing everything in order to benefit yourself.

So the debate is...what? Are all people egoists? No.

The debate was about altruism not existing, that every action is coated in selfishness

I think that he does have a point, everything we do, we do because we have a reason to. It's fair to say that charity and generosity are largely done because it makes the person doing it feel good.

These lolbert mistakes are born out of extrapolated rights, of half-truths. Of a reaction to living in a lie.

It’s time to eat people

-FreshMilk one week after a plane crash into the desert

Ching chong ping pong

Click click bang bang

Hello

Hello and welcome

Is this chat active much?

Not that much, I mean, it's a really new server, it can go from really big discussions or shitposting to really calm hours without new content

Kanye is so based

Gamers dont need women anyway

Were too busy building sexbots thatll be commercially available by 2030

are there also gay sexbots?

sexbots are putting coochie manufacturers out of business