Message from @Xinyue
Discord ID: 523887619579314186
but yeah there was quite a bit of Russification going on during the communist era of Mongolia. But nevertheless, Mongolia maintained a very ethnocentric image during the communist period, it wasn't true Russification in the complete meaning of the term
Surprinsingly Inner Mongolia knows more about Mongolia history and culture than Outer Mongolia
even if a lot of people are hanifing
also the Han culture of PRC has become downgraded in that they lost much of their own culture and somehow thought that downgrading the writing system into the "simplified" characters (which often just lose most of their original meaning in the process) was a good idea
a lot of the dialects were lost in Mongolia, in favor of a united culture a language, were in Inner it remained with their respectful differences
yeah
the People's Republic wasn't all bad though, tbh. It did probably make Mongolia the strongest it had been in centuries
Some commie say that without the work of Mao, China wouldn't be capable of rapid industrialization under Xi Jiping, even if that's true, the cost of cultures being lost was far to great in my opinion
I mostly dislike the People's Republic because of Xinjiang,Inner Mongolia and Hannification, overall they are decent enough
North Korea was 100x better(Under Sung, not the son/grandson) tough
eh, I think that Maoists are generally speaking wrong. Yes, China couldn't have advanced as fast as it did if it weren't for Mao's policies. However, it was an incredibly mixed bag - some good, common sense policies yielded great benefits but others, like Great Leap Forward, were just fucking brainlet attempts at modernising that obviously were going to fail and did fail with catastrophic consequences
soviet russia industrialized rapidly under stalin but it was still shitty
It is similar to what happened in Albania, Hoxhaism did some good, but the cost of State Atheism was great
oh yeah Hoxhaism wasn't very good either
yugoslavia industrilized under tito as well but I still stand that the yugo would be better off under a king and as a monarchy in post ww2 period
Hoxha *did* upgrade many infrastructural aspects and distribute services to an improved standard, but I think that it was a net negative in the end for Albania
If the King could maintain stability like Tito could, maybe
Tito's form of communism was probably the ideal way for Yugo, esp. after WW2
no way around it
and I'm glad it went down that path,
even if I have left Titoism, tenets of which I used to adhere to before, I still have immense respect for SFRY
and would like to replicate many aspects of its system
What are you currently?
at this point I think I can be called a Khrushchevite of some kind
wtf
how is this on BBC news cycle
why is this news?
because it's pewdiepie
oh I forgot, its bourgeois media
our future FΓΌhror
therefore not actual journalism
u think North Korea has actual journalism?
BBC is owned by the British State
the liberal capitalist state
socialist democracy that is also capitalist
but still makes u pay for national news and tv
It's an Illegitimate Government is all it is
it is not tho
u voted for it
That is part of why it's illegitimate