The problem with journalist selection is that in the modern world every youtuber can be counted as one. So it would be very difficult to vet it. Regardless I would answer yes if 1. it has a sufficiently big calliber of social impact and/or there was money involved.

agricultural socialism, with a rake and sickle sounds like an-prim-soc

anyway with the qotd I think there should be overwhelming evidence that they deliberately mislead the public then yes but if there is any doubts than they should have to retract their story but not be fired

If the social impact is big enough I would be fine with his loosing job just for not vetting the info.

sure

thats different

welp then we agree

thats one job vs "loss of their right to work in that field by law"

idk id just demote them to an intern or some shit or make them cover something stupid untill they got their shit together

there is tons of bitch work in journalism

well then we don't I guess.

but I would say it depends on the caliber of the issue.

yeah if someone dies because they misidentified someone then yes

but any issue that is worth a journalist to loose a job is preety much worth of a legal court varrant.

yeah

we most likely do disagree on what is counted a "big calliber issue" tho...

why

Because you are a classic liberal so we look at it from a different perspective.

this discussion

is the best

lol

ok

Hello and welcome, Alan Grand

@Todd Howard You can turn off pings from partnerships

by going to <#507040923884978176>

*quickly runs and hides*

@The Big Oof would you be willing to enterain a centerist role?

Hello and welcome, newcomers

@The Big Oof STOP PINGING ME

shut up John

U

@Fires You realize you can opt out, right?

that is a very smart and based idea

pls opt me out

u r a kind man

i appreciate ur brains