>1) man is a limited being, defined by the objects of his needs in the material world of phenomena
reductionism of a man, he's nothing more than his wants and needs.
>2) man is conditioned by material realities; his thoughts will not deliver him that which he needs, and for this reason he must labour - it is precisely labour which is the mode of being in which man is at his most substantial, when not only he pursues objects of his needs, but he changes reality itself to suit his needs
his thoughts won't deliver anything, but the communism will. completely removing a chance for a man to mature and again reduce him to his wants and needs and never going through a struggle to achieve something greater than himself or his initial goal. You see labor as an obstacle I see it as a necessity.
>3) man enters into social relationships because of the objects and subjects of his needs
another reductionism similar to ancap reductionism of social interaction
>4) and man's alienation from others (who are not part of his limited being but instead separate from it, despite being subjects of his needs and desires) is specifically ended when people labour together, pursue projects together, work to change life for the better and reality to accord with their will
more wrong conclusions from an already flawed view
your view is not meaningful, it's utterly void of meaning. There's no other purpose but to satisfy ur own ego
