Owning the libs @Spookaswa

lol

@Xinyue you know this wouldn't work out....

ethnos would separate

cultures would arise

and ideologies would change

you can't have a singular culture

let alone a WORLD culture

Ethnic groups, over time, have grown closer together not further apart

Ideology is not faith, it doesnt provide an objective morals nor

the "muh ethos" stuff is a myth lmao

@Xinyue why do you think so?

In your world it wouldnt make snese to divide the workers with ethnic struggle

Germany, Finland, France, China, Japan etc. This happens all over the world.

ever-increasing unification is the trend in history

>WHY
>DO
>YOU
>THINK
>SO

*the "muh ethos" stuff is a myth lmao*

Oof

Rekt

Did you even pay attention to what happened in those countries?

yes... this is why i'm asking you

muh class conflict

they weren't unified because "lul you know what would be gucci?"

With Liberalism people become disconnected from their nations as a whole so it's not suprising they start to unify over a common threat

I doubt the world would fully unite the instant communism becomes fully global, but it would eventually happen once the world is "prepared" to unite

Liberalism in practice posits that man is an atomized individual divided from his surroundings.

A Consumer, simply put

China, Japan, Finland, Germany. All of them have further unified, not drifted further apart. There's no longer any Aizu Domain or Matsumae Domain; there's no longer several kingdoms vying for power in China. The various independent cliques of Germany are in practice gone, as are the various tribes of Finland that used to be hostile to one another and very, very separate.

....

what did i say?

do you think they unified just because?

Nations themselves *emerged* as repudiation of earlier forms of separation

its built-in to the very concept of nation

i'm not talking about nations

*then why do you want their destruction for that one ethnos?*

Wait are you talking to me?

i'm talking about why do you think we're unifying

they unified due to material and technical conditions; there was incentive towards unification, threats from foreign lands and further internal prosperity

@ImATomato yes, but i'm talking to the finngolian

>they unified due to material and technical conditions; there was incentive towards unification,

Derived from what?

> threats from foreign lands and further internal prosperity

whay do we call this?

greed=

what happened here?

marxist clusterfuck