@Deleted User fat liberal pours maple syrup and facts and logic on himself

Okay, this is epic

And literally there's no parameter to determine which moral standardart is helahry or not

Morality is relative, and this is readily observable. If it does come from god, it must come from millions of gods as opposed to one.

I realized how to stop immorality

Lol

Pedophilia isn't immoral, change my mind

Shunning

Just stop breathing

You can have an image of an object and have it be an imperfect copy

Breathing is subjectively imoral

You're a commie, this is Hegel 101

Morality is immoral

Gravity is subjective

Shunning people is a non violent and non intrusive, as you are not violating their freedom, and it is effective

My ass is Subjective

Gay

No u

Nice

Everything is subjective, there is only mind

Morality is relative, and if morality is relative, it must be either

a) biologically emergent, and not from god
b) from several gods, each responsible for a differing kind
c) from one trickster god who hates the beings it created

The Hive Mind

Hey fellas, photons are subjective because I experience it through my own relative viewpoint

Very poor analogy, but coming from a Christian it should not surprise me

see,

Nigga your just claiming its subjective because ????

Again you have no argument

morality is fundamentally different from person to person, from culture to culture, from epoch to epoch. *If* there is one golden standard for morality, it must be

```If it causes pain, it is wrong```

This is probably the only objective standard that we can hope for, and it doesn't come from God. God, being unseen, unproven, unsensed and uninvolved, isn't a factor in the relations between living beings which are seen, are proven, sensed and involved.

But what if I'm a sadist?

>pain

>subjective experiences are objective standards

What???

So you agree wanking is wrong?

Pain is good

Well, lets add consent there

Are you legit tarded?

Consent is immoral, change my mind

Not as retarded as the man who invokes the unseen, the unproven and the untangible as an argument

That is actually stupid

at a level very unbecoming of a 21st century man

300 B.C.E primitive man? sure

not now though, after what we've learned of the world