like

jfc

>people that invented the term
honestly fuck them

he was trying to reform it

because socialism of old doesn't work

it wasn't "pure socialism" but a different implementation/system, if you will

so I guess we can define nationalism now as the desire to abolish borders, right? since definitions don't matter

u can try

lol come on lmao

no literally

Hitler's "socialism" was the antithesis of socialism

u won't succeed tho

in very same way

it's the third position, the synthesis, anti capitalist, anti marxist

no it wasn't, socialism ultimately had one goal in mind and that was to care for the worker and shield him from exploitation of the capitalist class

but again, the natsocs actually have no interest in any kind of coherent worldview. its not merely feels > reals, its feels to the exclusion of anything and everything real. its political solipsism to the highest degree

hitler managed to achieve that

oof

its pretty coherent my dude

le feels vs reals meme

what is leftism other that "we can't live like this"

like I would have respect to national socialists if they actually called their ideology something that reflected its content

like, idk, national capitalism. because that's what it actually is

no lol

if it was national capitalism it would look something like China

so basically, natsoc is the german expression of socialism
volkism

^

so socialism means nothing then

that's the logical conclusion

it has no meaning,

and anything can be projected unto it

dude do you want to read this or not lol so you can read

hurr it means nothing because it conflicts with my definition of it

joint ownership of the means of production is *the* common definition

not every concise plan can fit for every country. everybody has to make changes for it to work for their country

no no no

that's not it

its a very, very simple distinction

extremely general

joint ownership of the means of production. this could mean millions of different things