Message from @Enigmatic★Chromatic
Discord ID: 526441142271868958
Your non-point explained nothing
hoxhaists are gay
now i support xinu
Hoxa gang pride worldwide
@Xinyue literally all you did was talk about scientific socialism, not my argument
Oh yes, Maoist in 2018 - the great ideology of the agrarian-worker-bourgeois alliance is sure to deliver world revolution in the 21st century! Being a Maoist is a refutation of a persons politics by its own.
First world maoism is retarded
i agree
well that point we agree on at least
like, maybe its useful in Afghanistan
or something
but not beyond
Yes
I think that misunderstands Maoism
thats what i support
it's not useful anywhere
Third-Worldism then?
@Enigmatic★Chromatic i am saying maoism is literally third worldist
Since it's not just New Democracy
read the little red book
Yes, i know
Third World is an epithet
I'm offended
Stfu Storm 😄
NGR I guess I'll call you
ahhh.. now quiet
😌
What exactly are you NGR?
what's an NGR?
He's a NGRo
oh him
call him xinu
Oh I see Xinyue
Anyways
that's too long
Just curious
NPO>NGR
```The 1965 Soviet economic reform, sometimes called the Kosygin reform (Russian: Косыгинская реформа) or Liberman reform, were a set of planned changes in the economy of the Soviet Union (USSR). A centerpiece of these changes was the introduction of profitability and sales as the two key indicators of enterprise success. Some of an enterprise's profits would go to three funds, used to reward workers and expand operations; most would go to the central budget.
The reforms were introduced politically by Alexei Kosygin—who had just become Premier of the Soviet Union following the removal of Nikita Khrushchev—and ratified by the Central Committee in September 1965.
Major changes throughout the Soviet world became possible in 1964 with the ouster of Nikita Khrushchev and the rise of Alexei Kosygin and Leonid Brezhnev.[14] Economic policy was a significant area of retrospective anti-Khrushchev criticism in the Soviet press.[15][16] This 'reformist' economic tendency in the Soviet Union had corollaries and some mutual reinforcement in Eastern Europe.[17]```
So let me get this straight - the people who oust Khrushchev implement the market and profit reforms, and this was made possible only after Khrushchev's ousting, and Khrushchev was criticised by these people for holding onto the old ways, but he's le big rebisionist? 🤔
The accusation of revisionism was on putting the development of forces of production over class struggle as the principle contradiction