*Easy*

btw if i'm not mistaken, Loser's avi is from 1955 and the beginning of the Khrushchev era

not much, still learning.

let me date that

March 25, 1964

"interdevelopment of Nations", like USSR which everyone wanted to immediately split away from as soon as they could

is the exact date

"interdevelopment of Nations" like Yugoslavia

> and for Kruschev i have read on the cult of personality and Soviet policy in the international stage.

this is pretty little, that's just his speech on Stalin - it says NOTHING about the socio-economic, philosophical and theoretical position that consolidated around USSR in his time

> March 25, 1964

ah, my bad, the twilight of Khrushchev era then

Well the splits happened because of social imperialism and revisionism

Communists can never get Human Nature

oh ffs

that is your real enemy

not the Bourgeoisie

Hyooman Nateshure

I think that Marxists get it better

ofc u think that

ur a commie

dafuq

the Stalinists and other barracks communists are in denial, but for most part Marx and Engels got it down

>hooman nature

The human nature argument is a thought terminating cliche

what even is stalinism

what

it's just Marxism-Leninism

Stalinism = ML as it developed in 1930s and 1940s

Engles.. le family should wither away with my system guy

Khrushchevism = ML as it developed in 1950s and 1960s

because that has worked great for American nogs

Read Mutual Aid @AdorableStormtrooper

there is no Khrushchevism or Stalinism as standalone ideologies, but they do represent distinct trends

social implications of your policies are always catastrophic

and you never learn

@Xinyue I guess so, but one cannot be "Stalinist"

@AdorableStormtrooper How so?

"Gorbachevism" though doesn't exist, because it literally broke away from ML

yeah

its just

capitalism

tbh

because there's no analysis from that angle, everything is about resources