It would really complete the symbolism of their national emblem too
Plus they were social democrats.
Dat hammer and sickle would get completed
ew
stop this
this is unholy
they were social democrats but back then social democracy was still a socialist tendency, which it isn't anymore
@Deleted User no its good
it has a crown
Austromarxist Republic of Austria
gibs me this
nigga got a crown
not very marxist
The crown obviously could symbolise the sovereignty of the proletariat over their nation's economy!
faggot
lol
@Xinyue Do you think mussolini should've stayed Socialist.
no
There are emblems and flags where the crown does't reference royalty
he should've
maybe he could've found purpose in NatBol or NatCom
there are hammers and sickles that dont represent communism
yes but they all should represent communism
lmao
I was using it as an example
to how stupid that statement was
not but there are *literally countries where it doesn't reference the bloody royalty*
like
idk
**Republic of Austria**
like maybe
the habsburgs existed
and knowing commies they dont care how old it is
they'll destroy it
the emblem was established in 1919, when the country was still under influence of Austromarxists. And the hammer literally stands for working class, and the sickle for the farmers so the meaning is obvious 😄
Austria should go to its roots!
Austromarxist roots I mean
marxists should be shot
not the gay hapsburg shit
that stuff was awful
