I say that, over a century or so, the merging-together of nations will take place - for a myriad of different, sometimes contradictory reasons. It won't be sudden process.

Like I said, not in our lifetimes. We will see considerable integration among nations, we'll see mixing and more, but we won't see the wholesale disappearance of national majorities until the conditions for this are ready. And it will be somewhere in the 2100s, I think. Much integration, lots of it bourgeois no doubt, will happen in the 2000s though.

okay epic @Gerçek

I'm glad you're convinced.

so you're siding with the bourgeois? EPIC @Xinyue

Oh my god. I'm not an idealist, I look at *material and technical conditions* and how they develop. Historical materialism, do you know what that means?

yes i do, but its really funny that you admit that international capitalism will play a part in instating international communism

This is not me *siding* with bourgeoisie, this is me saying *how bourgeois society will do X and Y*

It means you just ignore half the things about motivations of people.

that about right?

@Xinyue

they are still the vehicle, which you ride on

Yes, the racist motivations of people is the reason why we all live in pure ethnostates....oh wait @Gerçek

>living with people like me is racist

truth is that people are not predispositioned towards this, which is why you guys need to struggle hard against the stream

So after communism it just becomes liberalism ?

uh yeah they are lmao

thats how tribes are formed

You guys ignore a whole lot about human nature, especially the spiritual element of it, even at times developing this great hatred of it.

thats how all biological collectives are formed

wasn't Hitchens a Socialist?

@Gerçek thank you

Literally are not, no. And tribes became kingdoms, kingdoms empires, empires into integrated politico-economic blocs (EU, ASEAN, ALBA, etc). The trend is always towards the *expansion* of a given political and economic system.

and i am for this, but for my people

But there's literally no reason apart from sentimentality of racial narcissism to do this

you can not make a single argument that is not that

People used to live under empires just fine, you don't necessarily *need* Nation States.

i can still cooperate with other races but why can't i stick to mine?

you can

You can stick to your white commune, and become a laughing stock for the observers

brutal

>laughing stock
lol ok
>hurr i'm a retard for wanting to be around people that are like me
you sound like a radical liberal individualist

which proves my point in intern. cap = intern com

you can choose to associate with who ever you like, most white people have white friends and family members, same goes for blacks ppl

Tribal association declined greatly once nation-states developed. You do not really have any tribal association in Finland, for example. Once the nations merge, same will happen to nations - they will become much like counties are today

but it's SOCIALLY COHESIVE because it's HOMOGENOUS
which is the point

Its not

yeah it is lol

Finland in 1918 had huge civil war, one of the most brutal in Europe, brother killed brother and father killed son

I lost the topic was afk

Homogenous is Subjective.. depends on what frame you're using..

yes