materialism is

pretending that all materialism is capitalism is yet another addition to weak arguments yes

go on

Communism = capitalism

Based

Horseshoe theory.

Sargon = Saint

lmao

embrace the third position 😎

Third position = Cuck position

it means nothing

its just extremism + centrism

yes just like your pseudo intellectual ideologizing
P U R E
I D E O L O G Y

I'm not centrist no

sorry

but you are

SARGON GANG

i mean your ideology

yeah gas sargon

It is ideology yes

astute observation

When you start genetic editing it will start with curing diseases at first, it will make users much more reproductively desirable so people will in fact start using it and users will replace non users in the population.

We already have no idea as to the implications of this but .. After the technology progresses enough, human engineers will start to look into Biological Enhancement and sell that. Again, users will likely replace non users and with time the tech will be mainstream.

With the development of AI (not even general intellegence AI) which is already happening, you will start to see that the AI will be able to come up with better mutations than human engineers simply because it can process more variables.

With Time, as humans start outsourcing their Evolution to this AI which doesn't need to be Terminater Level btw, it will slowly start coming with mutations that are good for humans as well as itself.

It will create mutations that make us dependent on the AI, and you will have this electronic phenotype over take our Natural Evolution, subjecting us to well, it's service. It gets more complicated but that's the best i can lay this case out.

@Xinyue

@Kazimir Malevich

@Gerçek Nootropics doesn't demand genetic editing, but even beyond that genetic editing will have certain very beneficial applications which will demand use at some point in future; too many good things can be achieved with these limited applications (such as removing deadly inherited diseases, etc).

And these basic applications (alongside future advanced nootropics) will be enough to yield the outcomes I've talked about for the past few hours. AI itself is not a necessary factor in this.

@Bee Third position does what was previously thought impossible and combines the worst aspects of the first two positions.

^^^^

it won't stay limited in it's application is the point as people see the benefits, adoption increases and adoptees replace non users

It can yes

lmao

easily

and neither can you prevent people from using those beneficial limited uses

you will never accomplish this

well, there is an element of inevitability yes

What you can do is argue for true AI ban because it is an existential threat

nootropics and limited use of gene-editing *isn't*

but that's not the point, you're making an active claim for this

without dealing with ethical concerns

I'm making an active claim that nootropics and gene-editing will be used, yes, and will yield certain outcomes.

Now,

humans are a species imbued with strong survival instinct