we don't need to side with capital and I never argued we should

Even a Richard Dawkins who has done considerable work with in this field has come out against this tech being used on humans

I merely showed that merging-of-nations is more or less inevitable as material and technical conditions evolve

to just slide aside all concerns in the Haze of Progressive Fervor is a mistake and makes you frankly a Brainlet

you, however, view everything via idealist lens - me saying that X happens due to Y must mean that I want X to happen due to Y and it could never be true that I want X to happen due to Z!

brilliant!

You have ideological investment in this technology.

At least instating communism, you said you’re riding the bourgeois wagon but yeah

yes, moral investment

you, moral abortions, do not

in fact! your investment is *against* the technology that can help billions

now that's a cross to bear indeed!

It’s really funny because capitalism and communism are both materialist ideologies

Materialism is pretty dandy yes

Yes capitalist materialism is so based

materialism is

pretending that all materialism is capitalism is yet another addition to weak arguments yes

go on

Communism = capitalism

Based

Horseshoe theory.

Sargon = Saint

lmao

embrace the third position 😎

Third position = Cuck position

it means nothing

its just extremism + centrism

yes just like your pseudo intellectual ideologizing
P U R E
I D E O L O G Y

I'm not centrist no

sorry

but you are

SARGON GANG

i mean your ideology

yeah gas sargon

It is ideology yes

astute observation

When you start genetic editing it will start with curing diseases at first, it will make users much more reproductively desirable so people will in fact start using it and users will replace non users in the population.

We already have no idea as to the implications of this but .. After the technology progresses enough, human engineers will start to look into Biological Enhancement and sell that. Again, users will likely replace non users and with time the tech will be mainstream.

With the development of AI (not even general intellegence AI) which is already happening, you will start to see that the AI will be able to come up with better mutations than human engineers simply because it can process more variables.

With Time, as humans start outsourcing their Evolution to this AI which doesn't need to be Terminater Level btw, it will slowly start coming with mutations that are good for humans as well as itself.

It will create mutations that make us dependent on the AI, and you will have this electronic phenotype over take our Natural Evolution, subjecting us to well, it's service. It gets more complicated but that's the best i can lay this case out.

@Xinyue

@Kazimir Malevich

@Gerçek Nootropics doesn't demand genetic editing, but even beyond that genetic editing will have certain very beneficial applications which will demand use at some point in future; too many good things can be achieved with these limited applications (such as removing deadly inherited diseases, etc).

And these basic applications (alongside future advanced nootropics) will be enough to yield the outcomes I've talked about for the past few hours. AI itself is not a necessary factor in this.

@Bee Third position does what was previously thought impossible and combines the worst aspects of the first two positions.