Of all the possible worldviews that one could assume, adopt, follow, it is *this?* For what reason? For what possible end would a person still adhere to the abrahamic creed? Why? There's no reason. Other than sentimental bullshit.
if your measurable of "superior" is that something is unobservable, unprovable, unseeable and in any capacity non-confirmable, you aren't a very sharp tool in the shed are you
Well if you by definition cannot observe a given thing, and never can, no matter what, even in cases where you should be able to, then yes its a pretty bad standard on part of the faith
ok then maybe you should simply conclude that all sensory perception is invalid (including the parts where you read the bible and became convinced that you are christian, or indeed the memories of you doing this) and embrace some form of epistemological solispsism
of course you don't do this, because the argument you put forward here isn't "le big think" that you pretend it is and is in fact entirely self-defeating but you apparently don't catch on this
nothing in my sensory perception validates Christian God. It does validate the existence of objective reality (which always defeats hard ontological solipsism) because it exists independent of my will or wishes, fears or dreams (it merely is), but nothing in this foundation of objective reality *confirms god* - what it does is confirm *materialism*
Except it doesn't, sensory perception can and has been tricked and is definitely fallible and for everything you say isn't sensory i can say it is due to you having no true knowledge on someone else's anecdote or senses
Sensory perception (or perception in general) doesn't ever validate God; but it does always validate objective reality, that is, something existing outside your will and agency
