Message from @Vex
Discord ID: 530095850408509461
Rosenberg went on record to state this
ACTUALLY attempt
To prove the holocaust
What did I find?
I don't care if the Nazis were dumb enough to keep their records straight, that won't prevent us from finding out the truth.
I found out
That everything
Then prove it @Kazimir Malevich
If you have *anything at all* to prove that the population dropped massively, you can put that now.
Doesn't fucking workl\
Bring up a single document
Please
Nothing that is actually used by historians to "prove" a genocide works
Ok it's all in there.
Nothing
None of the testimonies line up
Feel free to be debunked.
For any fucking camp
rekt.
All the witnesses claim wildly different things happened
Why
When exactly Hitler settled on straightforward murder as a means of removal has been harder to pinpoint. As Yale historian Timothy Snyder writes, “It cannot be stressed enough that the Nazis did not know how to eradicate the Jews when they began the war against the Soviet Union [in the summer of 1941]… They could not be confident that SS men would shoot women and children in large numbers.” But as Operation Barbarossa, the name for the Nazi invasion of the U.S.S.R, proved during the mass shootings of June 1941 and the massacres at Kiev in September, the Order Police and Einsatzgrüppen were more than willing to commit mass murders. This meant Hitler could take the solution to the Jewish problem to its “furthest extremes,” in the words of Philipp Bouhler, the senior Nazi official responsible for the euthanasia program that killed more than 70,000 handicapped German people.
So - link a single document
Why are these witness testimonies then compiled
In the same fucking works
That are used
As concrete proofs
@Vex A single document containing other documents. Weird how that works.
They don't even properly utilize these testimonies
The Nazis were quite explicit in what they wanted to do to them.
They selectively choose passages
They selectively make claims
@Kazimir Malevich Link what’s within the blogpost
Why do the historians do that for this particular "proven" historical event
I couldn't tell you they're out to make money I guess
Don’t post a link to what others created as your argument. Make an argument then supplement it with sources
@Vex Are you physically capable of reading?
But it's horseshit
Then read it.