None of the testimonies line up

Feel free to be debunked.

For any fucking camp

rekt.

You can list what the blogpost links

All the witnesses claim wildly different things happened

Why

When exactly Hitler settled on straightforward murder as a means of removal has been harder to pinpoint. As Yale historian Timothy Snyder writes, “It cannot be stressed enough that the Nazis did not know how to eradicate the Jews when they began the war against the Soviet Union [in the summer of 1941]… They could not be confident that SS men would shoot women and children in large numbers.” But as Operation Barbarossa, the name for the Nazi invasion of the U.S.S.R, proved during the mass shootings of June 1941 and the massacres at Kiev in September, the Order Police and Einsatzgrüppen were more than willing to commit mass murders. This meant Hitler could take the solution to the Jewish problem to its “furthest extremes,” in the words of Philipp Bouhler, the senior Nazi official responsible for the euthanasia program that killed more than 70,000 handicapped German people.

So - link a single document

Why are these witness testimonies then compiled

In the same fucking works

That are used

As concrete proofs

@Vex A single document containing other documents. Weird how that works.

They don't even properly utilize these testimonies

The Nazis were quite explicit in what they wanted to do to them.

They selectively choose passages

They selectively make claims

@Kazimir Malevich Link what’s within the blogpost

Why do the historians do that for this particular "proven" historical event

I couldn't tell you they're out to make money I guess

Don’t post a link to what others created as your argument. Make an argument then supplement it with sources

@Vex Are you physically capable of reading?

But it's horseshit

Then read it.

The bottom line is the holocaust is a fairy tale

Are you physically capable of creating an argument?

They used it to keep the Germans down

It's mundane atrocity propaganda

Jesus Christ

The bottom line is you were hit on the head as a child.

"I love how Holocaust believers will always try to avoid providing a certain piece of evidence on which they base a a specific claimbecause "theres already so much evidence"

That's exactly what you just did again.

The claim was about the census numbers of Jews in Europe declining during WWII by the millions. You instead inserted a page full of different arguments, but didn't link to one addressing this *specific* claim.

And Jews coopted it to use to make goyim feel bad for them

Reason being, you can't back up that claim and so you divert from it.

@Toast 24 You gonna name the book that's from or not

Or did you get that from some tinfoil hat fucking foundation site like USHMM

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/first-moments-hitlers-final-solution-180961387/

I mean, Germans are dimwits who need to be kept down to not start a WW3, but that's another story.

>smithsonian

Does that page have citations on the bottom