they didn't diversify the means of production

and 2

yes they did seize some meanings of production

as i said they expropiated plenty of properties

farms, companies, airlines, etc

They didn't control the means of production to begin with. And this was the *number one problem* with their gradualist, reformist praxis. They should've transformed the economy much quicker. They should've gone for full autonomy approach, or autarkic economic policy for the duration of the coming crisis.

they did

they did it

They didn't

no

they really didn't

Most of the Properties are State owned

most of the economy remained in the hands of the capitalists

the Private Sector is Small

false

that is actually false

like, shockingly false

proof your argument

tell me if its false

then why many companies closed and left the country?

why there's few companies investing in Venezuela?

you have not seen it pertinent to prove anything to me (so far I'm the only one who has bothered with economic data); but yes, even the Fox News made a piece on this

https://www.foxnews.com/world/what-socialism-private-sector-still-dominates-venezuelan-economy-despite-chavez-crusade

that's not true

it is true

now its your turn to show something for your claim

That Article is from 2010

very well - show me fresh information

2010 was the definite year when Chávez had a lot of Profit

show me data

or something

news, article, whatever

he had a lot of earnings due to the Oil prices wich they were at the time on 100$

then I can check upon the claims

each barrel

*links, mate*

http://www.noticierodigital.com/2018/04/kimberly-clark-demanda-venezuela-expropiacion-empresa-2016/

I don't read spanish...

"Kimberly Clark Demands Venezuela by expropiation of the enterprise in 2016"

the article was written the past year

what does that even say about the property-relations of the economy on the macro-scale? nothing

https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/05/15/actualidad/1526419600_916808.html