OOF I saw his posts

I wished for better

Im basically the literal opposite. Finland should have become a monarchy in 1918 and ally with Russian whites to defeat bolsheviks

oof

Good thing finns were more rational than you in 1918.

More like Russian whites were less rational than me

More like supporting monarchy at that time was tantamount to political suicide.

Yea, monarchy was losing popularity due to ww1

Actually scrap the "political" part.

Just suicide.

I'm not denying that. Doesnt make democracy any better though, especially in the long run

Stolypinian Democracy could be different.

Perhaps the only possible implementation of monarchy.

May I ask what religion do you follow?

Orthodox Christian. You?

Nice. I'm searching rn

For the record, I do not believe the idea of God-given political power, since that directly conflates Church and State, corrupting the former.

But I don't think you were asking because of that, hopefully. We had a bunch of decent monarchs, but our best times were during the times of the Veche, which was a very democratic public institution.

No I was asking for different reasons

so you are Russian

And by Veche you are referring to Novgorod republic

Not only Novgorod, Veche was a part of multiple Rus cities.

But ye.

@Deleted User Welcome

Hello.

@Deleted User If you wish, you can go get ranks in <#507040923884978176>

lol

I have a strange question because someone I know is annoying me

Is it considered perverted to masturbate once or twice every day?

its closer to cucked due to the current state of society

lol

I like aristocratic republics but my problem with them is that they usually succeed only when there is an established order where merchant states are allowed to exist and protected by more militant countries, or that there is a high level of isolation where geographic boundaries make it too costly for imperial countries to sack them. I also don't really regard them as "democratic" because decision making is clearly restricted to an elite (in places like Athens and Venice).

For this reason I prefer monarchy

Every system has it's pros and cons.

>having it is pros and cons

I am for an authoritarian governament because I think that with the current situation it is necessary as democracies are too uncohesive.

Also, other cons of democracy are its short-sightness and its inefficiency.

Er Bertes, "it's" means "it is", you're looking for "its" which indicates ownership

English is not my native language and I apologize for any grammatical mistakes.