People will always pursue their own profit, even if it means exploitation.

i agree, so then the emphasis should be in creating a system that allows people to profit without exploitation

Of course. That is when you need restrictions, to assure that the certain people with power do not abuse them; both politicians and richmen.

We agree?

we do, but its also important to realize that changes to the system dictate who those people who are politicians and richmen are

if your changes merely change who is on top, without changing the actions they're incentivized towards, there will always be a conflict

That's why we should have a nobility :p

i can accept a kind of "nobility of merit", hereditary nobility?

fuck no

just because your dad was a good guy doesnt mean you are

I can see what you mean.

appreciate you're just putting it out there and i get the appeal, hereditary entitlements just a bugbear of mine

As a Monarchical European, Royality and Nobility is close to heart.

Being raised to praise your King is something I can't explain.

minimum wage across the board

tax the rich 99%

**Communist Alert!**

Tax everyone 99%*

Oh, that's... Interesting.

That's pretty good @el pebble

@Deleted User and i get why, it would sadden me if the english monarchy went away and obviously theres alot of history and sentimental value put up around a certain family and those traditions but the problem is that hereditary nobility often invests power in those least capable of using it and most interested in abusing it

Genetics are extremely important and nobility is nothing but naturally important genetic families, and they will naturally fall out of noblehood by decay in due time if need be

if you needed to earn your family title id be more interested

genetics are meaningless

Genesis 1:27

learn Imago Dei scummy pagan

They still didn't give you the tag, here

you give me a role like this but ur the mexican pagan using fraktur text like ur some aryan

taco odin assblasted

@The Big Oof thanks for the recommendantion of using Brave instead of Chrome, it's faster in my computer and it has some things that chrome hasn't that I find pleasing

Oy vey, stop being an antisemite

yeah, he's right genetics are meaningless to the Christian dogma, any lowly existence is considered a Christian

I believe the role of a King is essential. - To have a man that unites the country under his governance, that can represent the nation through it's hardships. But a King is only as noble as the causes he serves.

how is that different to say, a president then?

To the Christian dogma, life itself is vanity

@CronoSaturn Presidents could serve the same purpose, but most often, they're only elected for 4-5 years before they disappear from the public and a new one takes his place. A King however spends his life, devoted to his country, and the Prince would succeed his burden, one day.

A President is just some normal guy whereas a King is someone above all, someone to strive to be and a Moral guidance

^

I don't get how people fail to get simple things like the difference of it's and its

kings are boring

it's not, since you're judged based on your deeds. Life is simply a road the soul has to take