And being against the status quo may change your opinion regarding women in the army, as I pointed out

Oh, and since I see you replying, let me mention that I was interested in the data, not necessarily on arguing, so if anyone else wants to get my place I'm ok with it.

@Bearer Of The Curse
1)so given that some women can achieve the same individually as men and that studies show mixed groups improve collective decision making there seems to be adverse costs of not accepting the opportunity that recruiting women may present

2) the conclusion was also that having female leadership was highly valued and contributed significantly to effect. You are cherry picking conclusions whilst asserting without demonstrating poll bias. It’s unclear why you believe I would accept this argument
3) a paper being complex or multifaceted shouldn’t be a mark against it nor should challenging intuition. (Or whatever commonsensical is). I’ve already discussed that you would need to demonstrate that data has been manipulated in order for your assertion to be considered anything more than autistic screeching. That a woman wrote something also has no impact on the weight of the argument.

"mixed groups improve collective decision making" you are applying this to the military?

I’ll also take the opportunity to clarify my position in I don’t think the stringent selection standards should be adjusted in order to fulfil a quota. As far as reasonably possible standards should be balanced against lethality and a sufficient pool to supply that capability.

In the west the economic impact of men or women is roughly the same with actuarial studies and is govt estimates giving a figure of roughly $ 10,000,000 regardless of gender. Reproduction plays a very small role here and the cost of losing citizens at all is a very high cost for western militaries so there seems to be little distinction gender holds in the impact caused by loss

@Max Zero yes

in what scenario?

What's cracking homies

Howdy

Why am I still titles suspicious

Didnt all the retards get excecuted

Scenarios where female recruits match physical requirements on the squad level but in a pretty broad area beyond that @Max Zero

Bearer said that you behaved

and you indeed behaved

that's not what I'm asking. In what scenario, in the military, do you envision mixed group collective decision making?

Behaved enough, not that he behaved completely

I mean we all make mistakes don't we?

*wink wink

*ban ban

Bearer? More like

Bearing

@Max Zero at every level group decision making occurs.

@CronoSaturn you really don't know anything about the military

Hahah ok

I fear when Bear Mjölnir strikes all of us

@Max Zero you show me a lt that doesn’t consult their nco’s and troops and I’ll show you a shit lt

DRVNK ODVN'S CVM

you are applying one of the most general, useless observations, that "mixed group" collective decision making is better (how much better, at what) to a very specialized hierarchical organization

this speaks volumes about you already

you must be very young

As I thought, Crono's reply added naught and was pretty much a restatement and overall refusal, so if anyone wants to answer go ahead

Army should be all women.

If there are no tits on my soldiers, why have an army?

The army should be anime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-kuOwUAHIQ

Howdy @✪ℤ𝕚𝕟𝕕𝕪Ⓐ. Welcome to the Nationalist Union. If you want ranks go to <#507040923884978176> and use ?ranks to see all available ranks and use ?rank enterrankname so that you can join one

doky

Is this a degenerate communist civ-nat furry?

epic

Socialist huh

you have no right to be calling others a furry, a weeb? rightful so, but a furry? That's a no-no