You can earn it by learning from the master himself

Why not suck my dick 😏 @CronoSaturn

@smiley boy

Mister spook is gone @Orwell

The Master is gone

degenerate absolute has a role that locks him into just a few channels

I can still tag his name

He isn't banned

he can't use this chat

because he wouldn't stop shitposting

I'm surprised that I didn't got the clownster role already

*being a degenerate

Understandable

it wasn't really for shitposting, it was for spamming stuff about gay sex over and over

his name isnt for show

alright hello

Howdy

are you an isis memeber

Anybody that says hello instead of Howdy deserves death

oh sorry howdy

<:ShrekFedora:521390487240966145>

why thank you

😹 😹 😹

@CronoSaturn
1- His arguments boil down to "some women can do that too" and he can't see any long term bad effects. Other minor points are plain shilling like social equality.

2- His conclusion is that women that passed have no difference with men in regards to training performance as reported by an opinion poll. The figure below also shows numbers that seem to indicate poll bias.

3-This one has a lot of arguments and is highly written, even though I don't have access to a lot of sources because it jumps to page 28 <:varg:521372050225627156> . I do however see that the arguments either challenge commonsensical wisdom or bend data. That results in a weird collection full of dubious data. And then I remembered that the argument of efficiency is ridiculous because women are more valuable than men and therefore the top women shouldn't run the same risk anyway. This was also written by a woman. Link: http://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/parameters/issues/summer_2013/3_haring_article.pdf

And being against the status quo may change your opinion regarding women in the army, as I pointed out

Oh, and since I see you replying, let me mention that I was interested in the data, not necessarily on arguing, so if anyone else wants to get my place I'm ok with it.

@Bearer Of The Curse
1)so given that some women can achieve the same individually as men and that studies show mixed groups improve collective decision making there seems to be adverse costs of not accepting the opportunity that recruiting women may present

2) the conclusion was also that having female leadership was highly valued and contributed significantly to effect. You are cherry picking conclusions whilst asserting without demonstrating poll bias. It’s unclear why you believe I would accept this argument
3) a paper being complex or multifaceted shouldn’t be a mark against it nor should challenging intuition. (Or whatever commonsensical is). I’ve already discussed that you would need to demonstrate that data has been manipulated in order for your assertion to be considered anything more than autistic screeching. That a woman wrote something also has no impact on the weight of the argument.

"mixed groups improve collective decision making" you are applying this to the military?

I’ll also take the opportunity to clarify my position in I don’t think the stringent selection standards should be adjusted in order to fulfil a quota. As far as reasonably possible standards should be balanced against lethality and a sufficient pool to supply that capability.

In the west the economic impact of men or women is roughly the same with actuarial studies and is govt estimates giving a figure of roughly $ 10,000,000 regardless of gender. Reproduction plays a very small role here and the cost of losing citizens at all is a very high cost for western militaries so there seems to be little distinction gender holds in the impact caused by loss

@Max Zero yes

in what scenario?

What's cracking homies

Howdy

Why am I still titles suspicious

Didnt all the retards get excecuted

Scenarios where female recruits match physical requirements on the squad level but in a pretty broad area beyond that @Max Zero

Bearer said that you behaved

and you indeed behaved

that's not what I'm asking. In what scenario, in the military, do you envision mixed group collective decision making?

Behaved enough, not that he behaved completely

I mean we all make mistakes don't we?