Whereas everybody else was like "nah fam all or nothing"

Germany be like "hold my beer I'm going to do German things"

Pretty much

I mean look at the Panzerschiff

What even is that

Is it a BB? Guns are there, armor's not. Is it a BC? Not enough displacement. It's too well armed to be a CA, but it can move like a CL.

This is why germans are banned from ship building

They just make things naturally OP

Well... not always.

Looking at you THREE SHAFT PROPULSION

Shhhh

WHO PUTS THREE SHAFTS ON A SHIP AND WONDERS WHY IT CAN'T MANUEVER WITH RUDDER DAMAGE

COME ON GERMANY

I WANT TO GET OFF THE RIDE

wow, reddit promoting that chinese social score shit

Bait

Lads, TIL IRS gives kickbacks if you report massive evaders

Yes and

Up to 30%

Report sadmin

I already tried

Fucker keeps his books clean

>Battleships had no secondaries
Niggerwhat
All Battleships had secondaries, they needed the smaller guns to deal with motor torpedo boats and other small, fast moving, targets that the main guns could not effectively engage.

*sigh* my god

Yes I know.

Comparitively however, when going from pre-dread, to dread, to fast BB, the secondary battery was sacrificed in exchange for larger main battery guns and armor mass.

Also, >BB secondaries firing at MTBs

You have bigger problems in that scenario

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/761153/EU_Exit_-_Legal_position_on_the_Withdrawal_Agreement.pdf

legal advice published on May's Brexit deal

"The agreement does not contain any provision on its termination. In the absence of such a provision, it is not possible under international law for a party to withdraw from the agreement unilaterally."

just a reminder, but by UK law no Parliament can bind a future Parliament, meaning the deal is actually illegal and unconstitutional

Wait, wouldnt that make entering the EU illigal in the 1st place as it bind future parliaments to EU law?

no

what it means is you can't stop a future parliament from undoing a law passed

ie you couldn't make a law and then have a part of make the law unrepealable

but the agreement apparently tries to do exactly that, unless its a good faith-based thing (?)

with the EU? It isnt

>UK x EU
>Good faith
Pick only one

Sounds retarded

Let's just invade the UK and begin a 2nd Imperial Reich